Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ingestion-ui) Add new form for the bigquery-beta connector #6200

Merged

Conversation

chriscollins3456
Copy link
Collaborator

Adds a new form for the bigquery-beta connector. It's similar to the regular bigquery form but with a few tweaks, including new allow/deny patterns, and a new field type (DATE).

This PR doesn't include bigquery-beta into sources.json quite yet so it won't be visible in the UI until we flip the switch. Getting this in there now will give us flexibility in how/when we roll this out, though.

the form:
image

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions github-actions bot added the product PR or Issue related to the DataHub UI/UX label Oct 13, 2022
@@ -19,17 +19,12 @@ const StyledRemoveIcon = styled(MinusCircleOutlined)`
margin-left: 10px;
`;

interface ListFieldProps {
interface CommonFieldProps {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this renaming

return setFieldValueOnRecipe(recipe, null, startTimeFieldPath);
}
const isoDateString = value.toISOString();
const formattedDateString = isoDateString
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you see this being used elsewhere (and should it be in a utils file)?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I certainly can - good call

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Unit Test Results (build & test)

597 tests  ±0   593 ✔️ ±0   11m 59s ⏱️ +15s
147 suites ±0       4 💤 ±0 
147 files   ±0       0 ±0 

Results for commit 9186cdd. ± Comparison against base commit 0c6eeb8.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@shirshanka shirshanka merged commit 9d5851c into datahub-project:master Oct 13, 2022
cccs-tom pushed a commit to CybercentreCanada/datahub that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2022
cccs-tom pushed a commit to CybercentreCanada/datahub that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
product PR or Issue related to the DataHub UI/UX
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants