Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(security): Bump ranger plugin commons dependency #6535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2022
Merged

fix(security): Bump ranger plugin commons dependency #6535

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2022

Conversation

pedro93
Copy link
Collaborator

@pedro93 pedro93 commented Nov 23, 2022

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (build & test)

621 tests  ±0   617 ✔️ ±0   15m 41s ⏱️ -1s
157 suites ±0       4 💤 ±0 
157 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit c91d5f9. ± Comparison against base commit 0862a22.

@pedro93 pedro93 merged commit 055196c into datahub-project:master Nov 23, 2022
@pedro93 pedro93 deleted the fix-ranger-plugin-cve branch November 23, 2022 17:18
cccs-Dustin pushed a commit to CybercentreCanada/datahub that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
@pedro93 @cccs-Dustin
fix(security): Bump ranger plugin commons dependency (datahub-project…
220d80c 
…#6535)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@david-leifker david-leifker david-leifker approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@pedro93 @david-leifker