-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ingest): add dummy data source for automated testing #6550
feat(ingest): add dummy data source for automated testing #6550
Conversation
metadata-ingestion/docs/sources/sample-data/sample-data_recipe.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/ingestion/source/sample_source.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/ingestion/source/sample_source.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | |||
source: | |||
type: dummy-data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we are not generalizing this, can we at minimum improve the name.
How about demo-source
or quickstart-data-source
or something similar. "dummy" doesn't have the best connotation overall
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
demo-data?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was that in the beginning and @treff7es had asked me to change it to dummy
Outdated review that does not have an impact on PR functionality as it is.
The purpose of this is to make it easier to demonstrate end-to-end flow without much external dependencies.
Also moved developing on metadata ingestion doc a bit to make it easier to find.
Checklist