Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

initial implementation of redshift dbt_clone macros and test design a… #505

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023
Merged

initial implementation of redshift dbt_clone macros and test design a… #505

merged 9 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

McKnight-42
Copy link
Contributor

@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 commented Jun 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

resolves #504

Description

adding some default redshift versions of dbt_clone macros and pulling in test for if cloning is not valid

Checklist

@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 22, 2023 19:56
@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 self-assigned this Jun 22, 2023
@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 requested a review from VersusFacit June 22, 2023 19:56
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Jun 22, 2023
@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 requested a review from aranke June 22, 2023 20:01
McKnight-42
McKnight-42 commented Jun 22, 2023
View reviewed changes
dbt/include/redshift/macros/materializations/clone.sql Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
{% macro redshift__can_clone_table() %}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for adapters who's values match that of default False do we want to go ahead and create adapter specific macros now incase we can swap the flag later or is this something we can remove for now? @aranke @ChenyuLInx

@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2023
Closed
@McKnight-42
Copy link
Contributor Author

running

dbt build --target-path target_name
dbt clone --state target_name --target alt_target_name --target-path alt_target_name

as per suggested by @aranke does appear to make the view creation in the alt target happen

aranke
aranke approved these changes Jun 29, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@aranke aranke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, verify that views are created in new schema.

@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 merged commit 0024261 into main Jul 11, 2023
@McKnight-42 McKnight-42 deleted the feature/dbt-clone-rs branch July 11, 2023 21:17
abbywh pushed a commit to abbywh/dbt-redshift that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
@McKnight-42
initial implementation of redshift dbt_clone macros and test design a… (
735a389 
dbt-labs#505)

* initial implementation of redshift dbt_clone macros and test design attempts

* remove dbt_clone macros that are unneeded

* add clean_up method to drop alt schema names after tests run

* change pointer back to main
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt approved these changes

@aranke aranke aranke approved these changes

@VersusFacit VersusFacit Awaiting requested review from VersusFacit VersusFacit is a code owner automatically assigned from dbt-labs/adapters

Assignees

@McKnight-42 McKnight-42

Labels
cla:yes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ADAP-652] [Feature] dbt-redshift Cloning from Production
3 participants
@McKnight-42 @aranke @colin-rogers-dbt