Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

estimateReadFiltering #518

Closed
dpryan79 opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

estimateReadFiltering #518

dpryan79 opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dpryan79
Copy link
Collaborator

It'd be nice to at least have a script to output the following:

  • Duplicates
  • singletons
  • total reads (include unmapped)
  • mapped reads
  • blacklisted reads
@dpryan79 dpryan79 self-assigned this Apr 25, 2017
@dpryan79
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This can be a random gist for now.

@dpryan79
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dpryan79 commented Apr 27, 2017

The script will in the end track the following:

  • Duplicates (marked externally, e.g., by picard)
  • Duplicates due to --ignoreDuplicates
  • Singletons
  • wrong strand (due to --filterRNAstrand)
  • too low mapq
  • excluded SAM flag (due to --samFlagExclude)
  • included SAM flag (due to --samFlagInclude)
  • reads in blacklisted regions
  • mapped reads
  • Total reads (including unmapped)

@dpryan79
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dpryan79 commented May 4, 2017

The current script is here

@dpryan79 dpryan79 added this to the 2.6.0 milestone May 14, 2017
dpryan79 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2017
@dpryan79
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dpryan79 commented Jul 7, 2017

  • Get the formatting to work in the --help output at the top (the list is broken).

@dpryan79
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dpryan79 commented Jul 7, 2017

This is now implemented in the develop branch.

@dpryan79 dpryan79 closed this as completed Jul 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant