Strip column mapping metadata when feature is disabled #3688
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which Delta project/connector is this regarding?
Description
Transactions might try to create or update the schema of a Delta table with columns that contain column mapping metadata, even when column mapping is not enabled. For example, this can happen when transactions copy the schema from another table without stripping metadata.
To avoid such issues, we automatically strip column mapping metadata when column mapping is disabled. We are doing this only for new tables or for transactions that add column mapping metadata for the first time. If column metadata already exist, we cannot strip them because this would break the table. A usage log is emitted so we can understand the impact on existing tables.
Note that this change covers the cases where txn.updateMetadata is called (the "proper API") and not the cases where a Metadata action is directly committed to the table.
Finally, this commit changes drop column mapping command to check that all column mapping metadata do not exist, and not only physical column name and ID.
How was this patch tested?
Added new UT.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing changes?
No.