Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(msgpack): add decode() test cases #5027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

kt3k
Copy link
Member

@kt3k kt3k commented Jun 11, 2024

part of #3713

This improves the test coverage of decode function of @std/msgpack

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.05%. Comparing base (1f359c4) to head (50a5e05).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5027   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.05%   92.05%           
=======================================
  Files         487      487           
  Lines       38798    38798           
  Branches     5429     5429           
=======================================
+ Hits        35714    35717    +3     
+ Misses       3027     3025    -2     
+ Partials       57       56    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@iuioiua iuioiua changed the title test(msgpack): add decode test cases test(msgpack): add decode() test cases Jun 11, 2024
@iuioiua iuioiua changed the title test(msgpack): add decode() test cases tests(msgpack): add decode() test cases Jun 11, 2024
@iuioiua iuioiua changed the title tests(msgpack): add decode() test cases test(msgpack): add decode() test cases Jun 11, 2024
@kt3k kt3k merged commit 1fd3830 into denoland:main Jun 12, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
@kt3k kt3k deleted the improve-msgpack-decode-test branch June 12, 2024 02:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants