Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(yaml): add undefined array entry test with skipInvalid option #5814

Conversation

timreichen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@timreichen timreichen requested a review from kt3k as a code owner August 25, 2024 17:43
@github-actions github-actions bot added the yaml label Aug 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.23%. Comparing base (b91817f) to head (60301eb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5814   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.23%   96.23%           
=======================================
  Files         479      479           
  Lines       38719    38719           
  Branches     5614     5615    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        37262    37263    +1     
+ Misses       1416     1415    -1     
  Partials       41       41           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@iuioiua iuioiua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Thank you.

@iuioiua iuioiua merged commit b2129ee into denoland:main Aug 25, 2024
16 checks passed
@timreichen timreichen deleted the yaml-add-invalid-array-entry-skip-invalid-option-test branch December 19, 2024 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants