-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 805
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement It.Is, It.IsIn, It.IsNotIn with a comparer overload #1064
Conversation
6fa0f44
to
e3978f6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great, thanks! 👍
In addition to my review comments, please also add an entry to the CHANGELOG.md
file, e.g. as follows:
The format is loosely based on [Keep a Changelog](http://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/).
+
+## Unreleased
+
+#### Added
+
+* New method overloads for `It.Is`, `It.IsIn`, and `It.IsNotIn` that compare values using a custom `IEqualityComparer<T>` (@weitzhandler, #1064)
+
## 4.14.5 (2020-07-01)
I've also included some review comments explicitly marked as "suggetions". If you choose not to follow them, I won't bother you about them again.
9e801e8
to
0cc2433
Compare
0cc2433
to
2442902
Compare
Yikes, my last edit applied those formatting again! Lemme rever that back. |
7570f40
to
b6b98f7
Compare
Ok fixed. Looks like it's ready to go. Thanks for your great effort @stakx, you're truly awesome! |
Still looking good, yes! FYI, it's probably going to take a few days until I'll merge this PR, as I'd like to first deal with #1061 and possibly do a patch release (4.14.6). This PR will go in 4.15.0 right afterward. 🚀 |
No worries, tx for the update, have a good one mate! |
I'm afraid I caused a merge conflict in |
Sure NP lemme rebase and merge. |
b6b98f7
to
f911802
Compare
Thanks @weitzhandler – this collaboration has been a breeze and very enjoyable! 👌 |
🙏 looking forward, thank you! |
Bumps [Moq](https://github.com/moq/moq4) from 4.14.7 to 4.15.2. #Changelog *Sourced from [Moq's changelog](https://github.com/moq/moq4/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md).* > ## 4.15.2 (2020-11-26) > > #### Changed > > * Upgraded `System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions` dependency to version 4.5.4 (@JeffAshton, [#1108](devlooped/moq#1108)) > > > ## 4.15.1 (2020-11-10) > > #### Added > > * New method overloads for `It.Is`, `It.IsIn`, and `It.IsNotIn` that compare values using a custom `IEqualityComparer<T>` (@weitzhandler, [#1064](devlooped/moq#1064)) > * New properties `ReturnValue` and `Exception` on `IInvocation` to query recorded invocations return values or exceptions (@MaStr11, [#921](devlooped/moq#921), [#1077](devlooped/moq#1077)) > * Support for "nested" type matchers, i.e. type matchers that appear as part of a composite type (such as `It.IsAnyType[]` or `Func<It.IsAnyType, bool>`). Argument match expressions like `It.IsAny<Func<It.IsAnyType, bool>>()` should now work as expected, whereas they previously didn't. In this particular example, you should no longer need a workaround like `(Func<It.IsAnyType, bool>)It.IsAny<object>()` as originally suggested in [#918](devlooped/moq#918). (@stakx, [#1092](devlooped/moq#1092)) > > #### Changed > > * Event accessor calls (`+=` and `-=`) now get consistently recorded in `Mock.Invocations`. This previously wasn't the case for backwards compatibility with `VerifyNoOtherCalls` (which got implemented before it was possible to check them using `Verify{Add,Remove}`). You now need to explicitly verify expected calls to event accessors prior to `VerifyNoOtherCalls`. Verification of `+=` and `-=` now works regardless of whether or not you set those up (which makes it consistent with how verification usually works). (@80O, @stakx, [#1058](devlooped/moq#1058), [#1084](devlooped/moq#1084)) > * Portable PDB (debugging symbols) are now embedded in the main library instead of being published as a separate NuGet symbols package (`.snupkg) (@kzu, [#1098](devlooped/moq#1098)) > > #### Fixed > > * `SetupProperty` fails if property getter and setter are not both defined in mocked type (@stakx, [#1017](devlooped/moq#1017)) > * Expression tree argument not matched when it contains a captured variable – evaluate all captures to their current values when comparing two expression trees (@QTom01, [#1054](devlooped/moq#1054)) > * Failure when parameterized `Mock.Of<>` is used in query comprehension `from` clause (@stakx, [#982](devlooped/moq#982)) > > > ## 4.15.0 > > This version was accidentally published as 4.15.1 due to an intermittent problem with NuGet publishing. #Commits - [`f2aa090`](devlooped/moq@f2aa090) ...
Fixes #1059.