Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: access SumType value by index, not type #10633

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2025

Conversation

pbackus
Copy link
Contributor

@pbackus pbackus commented Feb 2, 2025

Previously, code that already knew the desired index was forced to compute a type to pass to get!T or memberName!T, just for get!T or memberName!T to turn that type back into an index. Removing this unnecessary round trip simplifies the code.

Additionally, since memberName is no longer dependent on SumType.Types, it can be moved to module scope, and its instantiations can be shared across different SumType instances.

Previously, code that already knew the desired index was forced to
compute a type to pass to get!T or memberName!T, just for get!T or
memberName!T to turn that type back into an index. Removing this
unnecessary round trip simplifies the code.

Additionally, since memberName is no longer dependent on SumType.Types,
it can be moved to module scope, and its instantiations can be shared
across different SumType instances.
@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @pbackus! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + phobos#10633"

@dlang-bot dlang-bot merged commit c5d074b into dlang:master Feb 2, 2025
10 checks passed
pbackus added a commit to pbackus/sumtype that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
Previously, code that already knew the desired index was forced to
compute a type to pass to get!T or memberName!T, just for get!T or
memberName!T to turn that type back into an index. Removing this
unnecessary round trip simplifies the code.

Additionally, since memberName is no longer dependent on SumType.Types,
it can be moved to module scope, and its instantiations can be shared
across different SumType instances.

Phobos PR: dlang/phobos#10633
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants