Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build OSX binary on Travis #3048

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2016
Merged

Conversation

dnephin
Copy link

@dnephin dnephin commented Feb 29, 2016

Fixes #271

This requires a change to the make-branch script, to have it push the bump branch
to the docker remote instead of the user remote. Pushing to the docker remote
triggers the travis build, which builds the binary.

@@ -35,3 +30,5 @@ script/build/image $VERSION
echo "Create a github release"
# TODO: script more of this https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/releases/
browser https://github.com/$REPO/releases/new

echo "Don't forget to download the osx and windows binaries from appveyor/bintray\!"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the bintray URL predictable? Would be good to print it here if so.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is, I've added the url

@dnephin dnephin force-pushed the osx_bin_from_travis branch from 66794d7 to 04877d4 Compare March 1, 2016 16:34
This requires a change to the make-branch script, to have it push the bump branch
to the docker remote instead of the user remote. Pushing to the docker remote
triggers the travis build, which builds the binary.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <[email protected]>
@aanand
Copy link

aanand commented Mar 2, 2016

LGTM

aanand added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2016
@aanand aanand merged commit f84ebf9 into docker:master Mar 2, 2016
@dnephin dnephin deleted the osx_bin_from_travis branch March 2, 2016 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants