Bound field or property expression convention #32511
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'm going to go ahead with this. Mackinnon will look at it later when his schedule opens up a bit. |
|
Thank you @guardrex. I haven't taken the time yet to look into it but the example looks good. I do not have permission however to open the preview link. |
|
Thanks! At least, this will provide a little guidance until Mackinnon can look. He may be able to provide better descriptive language.
That's normal. It's for internal review by Microsoft folks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #30656
cc: @AntMaster7 ... I had a few minutes to whip something up, but I'm not necessarily keen on my example and text. I say that this would have an obvious use in creating custom validation components, which isn't something that the Blazor docs here cover. This is a bit of an advanced framework feature for custom scenarios. Can you look this over along with the sample components ...
... and see if you think this will at least get it covered until Mackinnon is free. He's buried in work for the next few months, and I don't want to disturb him unless absolutely necessary. I'm going to make a tracking entry to make sure that I discuss this section and example with him later. For now tho, do you think this is about what you would've needed to see for your own purposes back when you went looking for doc coverage on it?
Internal previews