Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial support for global implicit usings #7512

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 30, 2021

Conversation

drewnoakes
Copy link
Member

@drewnoakes drewnoakes commented Aug 25, 2021

Addresses the aspect of #7488 that we will tackle in 17.0.

This adds a single check box that enables/disables this feature.

In future we should add UI to allow modifying the set of usings directly.

We will also need to add logic to support VB separately, as that uses a different property to control this.

image

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@drewnoakes drewnoakes added the Feature-Project-Properties-Designer The new project property pages which replace the legacy AppDesigner label Aug 25, 2021
@drewnoakes drewnoakes added this to the 17.0 milestone Aug 25, 2021
@drewnoakes drewnoakes requested a review from a team as a code owner August 25, 2021 04:28
This adds a single check box that enables/disables this feature.

In future we should add UI to allow modifying the set of usings directly.

We will also need to add logic to support VB separately, as that uses a different property to control this.
@drewnoakes drewnoakes force-pushed the issue-7488-implicit-usings branch from f743c39 to f009bbf Compare August 30, 2021 00:24
@drewnoakes
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased to fix merge conflicts.

@drewnoakes drewnoakes merged commit 25de7f7 into dotnet:main Aug 30, 2021
@drewnoakes drewnoakes deleted the issue-7488-implicit-usings branch August 30, 2021 03:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature-Project-Properties-Designer The new project property pages which replace the legacy AppDesigner
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants