Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JIT ARM64-SVE: Add CreateWhileLessThan* #100949
JIT ARM64-SVE: Add CreateWhileLessThan* #100949
Changes from 6 commits
944467a
3f62ba9
ddd7168
a0b5687
941c306
c6eb008
1bd25c4
e5bd3d8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this going to be a more common pattern? Should we have a way to make it more table driven?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Problem is we need to know the name of the intrinsic in order to know the
opt
value (egINS_OPTS_SCALABLE_H
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we not tracking the vector type anywhere? We have a couple fields (simdBaseJitType and altType for example) so we should be able to track both the overload type (
int
vsuint
vslong
vsulong
) and the vector base type/sizeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Switched the code so that it uses the return vector type as the basetype, and set auxiliary type to arg1 type. That simplifies the code a lot and removes many of my changes.