-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[wasm] Mark System.Threading.Thread APIs unsupported on Browser #41892
Closed
mdh1418
wants to merge
4
commits into
dotnet:master
from
mdh1418:mdhwang/system_threading_thread_unsupported
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b0f9910
System.Threading.Thread enable platform attributes
fa2a503
[wasm] Mark System.Threading.Thread APIs unsupported on Browser
20ad956
System.Threading.Thread remove CurrentPrincipal false positive
59534f0
Mark System.Threading.Thread ResetAbort as obsolete
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since this throws PNSE everywhere, is there a way we can mark it as such?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if its better to stick with the convention of marking it Obsolete. I wasn't sure if a docs issue should be linked in the parameters of
Obsolete
. It looks like it was brought up in dotnet/docs#3825.Another option that was brought up was to mark this as
[UnsupportedOSPlatform("none")]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jeffhandley @buyaa-n What do y'all think about
[UnsupportedOSPlatform("none")]
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the analyzer that would be treated like unsupported on a platform named "none", there is no generic naming for all platforms CC @terrajobst
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[Obsolete]
would be a better approach than to fake that with an[UnsupportedOSPlatform]
or[SupportedOSPlatform]
attribute. I recommend we omit this annotation here and file a 6.0.0 issue to mark this API as Obsolete.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was looking at a stale page a moment ago. I think we'll have to wait to mark this as
Obsolete
until 6.0.0 since it's technically a breaking change. We'll want to consider using a custom diagnostic id for the obsoletion too and add it to the list of obsoletions, etc.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with Jeff. We shouldn't annotate this API. We should obsolete, but not for .NET 5.