Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Equals/GetHashCode for UnixDomainSocketEndPoint #69722

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 8, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis;
using System.Text;
using System.IO;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -124,12 +125,18 @@ public override string ToString()
}
}

public override bool Equals([NotNullWhen(true)] object? obj)
=> obj is UnixDomainSocketEndPoint ep && _path == ep._path;

public override int GetHashCode() => _path.GetHashCode();

internal UnixDomainSocketEndPoint CreateBoundEndPoint()
{
if (IsAbstract(_path))
{
return this;
}

return new UnixDomainSocketEndPoint(_path, Path.GetFullPath(_path));
}

Expand All @@ -139,6 +146,7 @@ internal UnixDomainSocketEndPoint CreateUnboundEndPoint()
{
return this;
}

return new UnixDomainSocketEndPoint(_path, null);
}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -518,6 +518,43 @@ public void UnixDomainSocketEndPoint_RelativePathDeletesFile()
}).Dispose();
}

[ConditionalFact(nameof(PlatformSupportsUnixDomainSockets))]
public void AbstractPathEquality()
{
string abstractPath = '\0' + Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
UnixDomainSocketEndPoint endPoint1 = new(abstractPath);
UnixDomainSocketEndPoint endPoint2 = new(abstractPath);
UnixDomainSocketEndPoint endPoint3 = new('\0' + Guid.NewGuid().ToString());

Assert.Equal(endPoint1, endPoint2);
Assert.Equal(endPoint1.GetHashCode(), endPoint2.GetHashCode());

Assert.NotEqual(endPoint1, endPoint3);
Assert.NotEqual(endPoint2, endPoint3);
Assert.NotEqual(endPoint1.GetHashCode(), endPoint3.GetHashCode());
Assert.NotEqual(endPoint2.GetHashCode(), endPoint3.GetHashCode());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These hashcode NotEqual asserts could sporadically fail. It should be exceedingly rare, but better to remove them. We could instead assert that the endpoint hashcode equals the path hashcode, and leave the correctness of the path hashcode up to string's implementation.

Same for the test below.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because of hash code collision.. hmm, makes sense. I would prefer just to remove NotEqual assertions.

}

[ConditionalFact(nameof(PlatformSupportsUnixDomainSockets))]
public void FilePathEquality()
{
string path1 = "relative" + Path.DirectorySeparatorChar + "path";
string path2 = new(path1); // make a copy to avoid reference equality
string path3 = GetRandomNonExistingFilePath();

UnixDomainSocketEndPoint endPoint1 = new(path1);
UnixDomainSocketEndPoint endPoint2 = new(path2);
UnixDomainSocketEndPoint endPoint3 = new(path3);

Assert.Equal(endPoint1, endPoint2);
Assert.Equal(endPoint1.GetHashCode(), endPoint2.GetHashCode());

Assert.NotEqual(endPoint1, endPoint3);
Assert.NotEqual(endPoint2, endPoint3);
Assert.NotEqual(endPoint1.GetHashCode(), endPoint3.GetHashCode());
Assert.NotEqual(endPoint2.GetHashCode(), endPoint3.GetHashCode());
}

private static string GetRandomNonExistingFilePath()
{
string result;
Expand Down