Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add public APIs for persisted AssemblyBulder #97177
Add public APIs for persisted AssemblyBulder #97177
Changes from 2 commits
cd86a5b
0dc5f12
7b79bea
23304b6
f854c54
444225b
eaa7434
509a4c0
d1e8d20
a4c735a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was it not possible for someone externally to derive from AssemblyBuilder in .NET 8 and earlier? Adding a new abstract method will break anyone who did.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We made the
AssemblyBuilder
abstract in .NET 8, before it was sealed. So only .NET 8 can be considered, and I think it's unlikely somebody would have derived fromAssemblyBuilder
and build their own implementation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it was possible to derive from AssemblyBuilder in .NET 8, then this is a binary breaking change. I think we need to make it virtual with the base implementation throwing.
cc: @terrajobst
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done