Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Derelease "with" keyword in Check grammar #97

Closed
RGHenderson opened this issue May 16, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Derelease "with" keyword in Check grammar #97

RGHenderson opened this issue May 16, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug cleanup clean up the code base

Comments

@RGHenderson
Copy link
Contributor

If the 'with' keyword is present in a check source, compilation fails with an UnsupportedOperationException

As the 'with' grammar element is not actually used, it makes sense to just de-release it rather than make it stable once more.

@RGHenderson RGHenderson added bug cleanup clean up the code base labels May 16, 2018
@RGHenderson RGHenderson self-assigned this May 16, 2018
RGHenderson pushed a commit to RGHenderson/dsl-devkit that referenced this issue May 17, 2018
 - De-release the check language with construct and associated tests,
validations, quick-fixes, generator code
 - Clean up use of '==' when comparing with null in touched xtend
sources
 - Change the check genmodel compliance to java 8, and commit the
associated javadoc changes
RGHenderson added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2018
#97: De-release check 'with' construct
RGHenderson pushed a commit to RGHenderson/dsl-devkit that referenced this issue May 23, 2018
 - De-release the check language with construct and associated tests,
validations, quick-fixes, generator code
 - Clean up use of '==' when comparing with null in touched xtend
sources
 - Change the check genmodel compliance to java 8, and commit the
associated javadoc changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug cleanup clean up the code base
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant