-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #55 from dwyl/braga
Braga
- Loading branch information
Showing
5 changed files
with
918 additions
and
2 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ | ||
# The (dwyl) NetWork [_Work-in-Progress_] | ||
|
||
A network of creative technology people engaged | ||
in learning, fulfilling/innovative work | ||
with a socially beneficial outcome. | ||
|
||
## _Why_? | ||
|
||
There is no shortage of "professional networks", | ||
LinkedIn being the most prominent one. | ||
On LinkedIn people _pay_ for "Premium" | ||
which is $10/month and allows ... | ||
> Please summarize the list of Premium "features". `help wanted` | ||
LinkedIn could do a _whole_ lot more with the community, | ||
but because they have steady revenues they have all but stopped innovating | ||
(_we don't count occasional UI changes as "innovation"..._). | ||
|
||
> _See below for "**The Problem with LinkedIn**"_. | ||
## _What_? | ||
|
||
The Creative Technology Rapid Learning Community. | ||
Connect and learn with people who are experienced/knowledgeable | ||
in the field you are interested in. | ||
|
||
### Content Will _Always_ Be Free | ||
|
||
All _recorded_ content is (_and always will be_) free. | ||
This is essential for ensuring ***accessibility*** | ||
to people who cannot (_yet_) afford to pay for learning. | ||
|
||
>_The **last** thing we want is to create a "pay wall" | ||
like FrontEnd Masters or TreeHouse | ||
which are **way** out of reach for unemployed | ||
people in low-income countries!_ | ||
|
||
Once people feel a bit more confident with their knowledge/skills, | ||
and are getting _income_ from their chosen skill they will | ||
naturally want to "_support the network_" with a _nominal_ | ||
payment. The payment will grant them _considerable_ additional value/benefit. | ||
|
||
### Paid Value-Added Services (_Which Cost Money to Provide_) | ||
|
||
+ Connect with fellow creative technology professionals | ||
without fear of being spammed by recruiters. | ||
+ Live-streams learning workshops and meetups. | ||
+ Access to ask questions of the highly experienced/skilled people | ||
delivering the workshop in real-time. | ||
+ Request personal advice from industry insiders. | ||
+ Get notified of potential work by NetWork Members. | ||
+ Meet and interact with other creative people online and in-person. | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## _Who_? | ||
|
||
People who want to learn and do | ||
creative technology work professionally. | ||
|
||
|
||
# _How_? | ||
|
||
## Membership | ||
|
||
How does someone _become_ a member? | ||
People can either _apply_ in which case they need to submit | ||
|
||
|
||
## Membership Fees? | ||
|
||
If we charge $10/month it might sound "_reasonable_" | ||
to most people in G20 ("_developed_") countries where average earnings are | ||
comparatively _high_ by international standards. | ||
But if your _income_ is $100/month (_e.g: in Manila or Mobassa) | ||
then $10 is prohibitively expensive | ||
(_even if you get a 10x the value of the membership fee it's still a lot | ||
in the beginning for someone on a lower income..!_) | ||
|
||
### 1% of Minimum Wage? | ||
|
||
> _**1% of National Minimum Wage** for the country you are based in_. | ||
If **Minimum Wage** is **€650**/month (_e.g. Portugal_) | ||
then your membership fee is €6.50/month. | ||
|
||
On reflection this is a pretty good deal given what's included. | ||
|
||
### Free Tier? | ||
|
||
We think _everyone_ should be able to benefit | ||
from the _content_ (_learning materials_) | ||
regardless of their ability to pay. | ||
But to avoid "_spam_" and "_noise_" | ||
the "real-time" community features should be invite-only and paid. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Hyper Transparency | ||
|
||
We will maintain ***100% Transparency*** in the "dwyl NetWork" | ||
it will be _clear_ to all members _exactly_ where their membership fee | ||
is being spent (_mostly content creation, infrastructure/servers and admin_). | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> | ||
|
||
## tl;dr | ||
|
||
I used to be _very_ active on LinkedIn in the _early_ days. | ||
I saw it as a great way to stay in touch with people I knew | ||
and/or had worked with professionally. | ||
I considered it to be the best "online CV". | ||
We used to joke "Jenny just updated her LinkedIn, | ||
she must be getting ready to move jobs". | ||
As soon as the HR/Recruiter people started _actively_ using it, | ||
they spoiled it. | ||
|
||
|
||
### The Problem with LinkedIn | ||
|
||
The _problem_ with LinkedIn is: _recruiters_! | ||
LinkedIn started out as a professional network, | ||
but rapidly became a tool for recruiters to "_source_" talented people. | ||
If you are _any_ good at what you do and you make it known on LinkedIn | ||
you will get a _flood_ of unsolicited messages, emails and phone calls! | ||
And if you happen to _connect_ with a recruiter, they will _spam_ all | ||
_your_ connections! :sad: | ||
|
||
### Recruiters | ||
|
||
_Most_ recruiters are ***sales people*** without any _real_ skills | ||
other than persuasion techniques and sales tactics. | ||
|
||
Their job is to fill positions as quickly as possible | ||
in order to maximize their commission. | ||
Recruiters are _seldom_ paid on | ||
|
||
### Spam on LinkedIn | ||
|
||
> Todo: upload screenshot of spam on LinkedIn. |
Oops, something went wrong.