-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
small ITCStorage obj term name change for better testing #199
Conversation
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/E4ST.jl/E4ST.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTarget
Baseline
Target resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/E4ST.jl/E4ST.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Baseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/E4ST.jl/E4ST.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Runtime information
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no problems with this.
this was a small change to make it more consistent with how the ITC is named in the objective function which makes it easier to test. If there is some reason to use the _obj suffix let me know