-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
changing -Inf to -1 in save updated gen table #231
Conversation
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/E4ST.jl/E4ST.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTarget
Baseline
Target resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/E4ST.jl/E4ST.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Baseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/E4ST.jl/E4ST.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Runtime information
|
@@ -352,6 +352,14 @@ function save_updated_gen_table(config, data) | |||
return row.pcap_inv_sim | |||
end | |||
|
|||
#update pcap_plant_avg, pcap_hist and pgen to -1 instead of -Inf to be excel compatible | |||
for row in eachrow(gen_tmp) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I wonder if it makes more sense to do this on the input side? I.e. so that -Inf is never introduced in the first place? Let me know what you think
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could do this, I made an e4st-input-processing issue about it, but going to merge this for now anyways.
addresses #230