chore: QGate preparations

[paullatzelsperger]

WHAT

Adds missing pieces for QGate evaluation

WHY

I ask myself that question daily.

FURTHER NOTES

List other areas of code that have changed but are not necessarily linked to the main feature. This could be method signature changes, package declarations, bugs that were encountered and were fixed inline, etc.

Relates to eclipse-tractusx/sig-release#689

[evegufy]

LGTM in general!
Just another thing which came into my mind regarding this TRG
https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/docs/release/trg-5/trg-5-01

You might want to look into setting that default value https://github.com/paullatzelsperger/bpn-did-resolution-service/blob/chore/qgate_preparations/system-tests/helm/values-test.yaml#L25, otherwise this might not be compliant, just pointing it out.

[paullatzelsperger]

You might want to look into setting that default value https://github.com/paullatzelsperger/bpn-did-resolution-service/blob/chore/qgate_preparations/system-tests/helm/values-test.yaml#L25, otherwise this might not be compliant, just pointing it out.

LGTM in general! Just another thing which came into my mind regarding this TRG https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/docs/release/trg-5/trg-5-01 You might want to look into setting that default value https://github.com/paullatzelsperger/bpn-did-resolution-service/blob/chore/qgate_preparations/system-tests/helm/values-test.yaml#L25, otherwise this might not be compliant, just pointing it out.

I don't think that is a good idea, as it will lead to bogus trusted issuers by default (a topic we've had problems with in the past), and thus purposefully lead users on a wrong path. Providing dummy default values, that won't work anyway, does more harm than good.