Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Saving calibration files for operations #178

Closed
FatimaPillosu opened this issue May 5, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Saving calibration files for operations #178

FatimaPillosu opened this issue May 5, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority 1 STOP. This is preventing EVERYONE from using the software.
Milestone

Comments

@FatimaPillosu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Anirudha,
as discussed last week, this issue comes from a request from @EstiGascon and @AugustinVintzileos.
It is about the possibility to save the calibration files for operations using only a sub-group of the predictors considered initially.
This is a good idea so the operator can discard those predictors that were not found interesting during the research phase without the need to regrow the decision tree from scratch with only the predictors of interest to create the calibration file in operations.
We would also need to include the creation of the point data table that creates a new point data table that contains only the predictors considered, so there won't be any confusion.
Cheers,

Fatima

@FatimaPillosu FatimaPillosu added enhancement New feature or request priority 1 STOP. This is preventing EVERYONE from using the software. labels May 5, 2021
@FatimaPillosu FatimaPillosu added this to the Enhancements milestone May 5, 2021
@onyb
Copy link
Contributor

onyb commented May 14, 2021

Fixed in v0.28.0.

@onyb onyb closed this as completed May 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority 1 STOP. This is preventing EVERYONE from using the software.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants