fix: support simple test on normal app #179
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@fengmk2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
commit: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/app/router.js (1)
1-7: Looks good – consider adding error handling or logging for more robust routing.
This simple GET endpoint works as intended and returns a JSON response. However, you may want to handle potential errors or unexpected inputs to safeguard against silent failures and facilitate debugging in more complex scenarios.test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/test/helloworld.test.js (1)
1-11: Consider asserting the HTTP status code in addition to the response body.
Although validating the response body is good, including a status code assertion ensures that the server returns a valid success code..expect({ hello: 'world', }) +.expect(200)test/bootstrap.test.ts (1)
7-20: Debug might yield noisy logs.
The.debug()call can produce verbose logs, which may be valuable during development but disruptive in CI or production environments. Consider removing it or using it conditionally.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
README.md(1 hunks)README.zh_CN.md(1 hunks)src/bootstrap.ts(1 hunks)src/index.d.ts(0 hunks)src/lib/app_handler.ts(1 hunks)test/app_proxy.test.ts(1 hunks)test/bootstrap.test.ts(1 hunks)test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/app/router.js(1 hunks)test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/config/config.default.js(1 hunks)test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/package.json(1 hunks)test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/test/helloworld.test.js(1 hunks)test/index.test-d.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/index.d.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/package.json
- README.zh_CN.md
- test/fixtures/apps/helloworld/config/config.default.js
- test/app_proxy.test.ts
- README.md
- test/index.test-d.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/bootstrap.ts (1)
16-16: Exporting the app instance is a helpful addition.
Enabling other modules or tests to consume this app instance is a good approach. Ensure you also handle the app’s lifecycle properly (e.g., listening, closing) if used in broader contexts.
Also applies to: 21-21
src/lib/app_handler.ts (1)
49-49: Ensuring a consistent return value improves reliability.
Adding a return app statement at the end of setupApp ensures the function returns an instance regardless of which branch is taken, improving predictability for callers. This is an effective change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/app.test.ts (1)
93-97: Refactor test to ensure consistent resource cleanupIf the assertion fails or the error message does not match expectations, the test will not call
app.close(). Consider wrapping theapp.ready()call in atry/catch/finallyblock so thatapp.close()always executes, ensuring consistent resource cleanup:it('should emit error when load Application fail', async () => { const baseDir = getFixtures('app-fail'); const app = mm.app({ baseDir, cache: false }); - await assert.rejects(app.ready(), /load error/); - await app.close(); + try { + await assert.rejects(app.ready(), /load error/); + } finally { + await app.close(); + } });
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #179 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 49.54% 57.34% +7.79%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 2430 2431 +1
Branches 64 191 +127
==========================================
+ Hits 1204 1394 +190
+ Misses 1226 1037 -189 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
[skip ci] ## [6.0.1](v6.0.0...v6.0.1) (2024-12-29) ### Bug Fixes * support simple test on normal app ([#179](#179)) ([3b0957f](3b0957f))
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
package.jsonfor the "helloworld" application.Documentation
Chores
Refactor
src/index.d.tstype definitions.src/bootstrap.tsto export app instance.src/lib/app_handler.tsto ensure app return.test/app.test.tsfor improved readability and maintainability.test/app_proxy.test.tsto run all tests.