Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry-pick #17198 to 7.x: Update redis dependency as output #17234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2020

Conversation

mtojek
Copy link
Contributor

@mtojek mtojek commented Mar 25, 2020

Cherry-pick of PR #17198 to 7.x branch. Original message:

This PR verifies if redis dependency can be updated, which means that the libbeat output supported versions can be adjusted accordingly.

@mtojek mtojek requested a review from a team March 25, 2020 07:48
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ output.redis:

==== Compatibility

This output works with Redis 3.2.4.
This output is expected to work with all Redis versions between 5.0.8 and 3.2.4. Other versions might work as well,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I realize this is the backport PR which mirrors the PR to master, but any reason we listed the versions in this order? Ascending order seems more natural to me, but perhaps that's an English bias?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I admit I missed it here, I will merge this PR and do another round of PRs to fix it.

Copy link
Contributor

@ycombinator ycombinator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a minor comment on the content (which applies to the original PR to master as well).

As far as the backport goes, though, this PR LGTM.

@mtojek mtojek merged commit 42e88f0 into elastic:7.x Mar 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants