-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "build(deps): bump the gcp-sdks group across 1 directory with 10 updates" #41269
Revert "build(deps): bump the gcp-sdks group across 1 directory with 10 updates" #41269
Conversation
…10 updat…" This reverts commit 89ed20d.
Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent-data-plane (Team:Elastic-Agent-Data-Plane) |
Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent (Team:Elastic-Agent) |
This pull request does not have a backport label.
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 from me. But PR says you require a tech lead to approve. Probably need @cmacknz to approve it.
The original PR was never backported to 8.x, see #41203 |
I also want to make clear that this change did pass for It is not clear why it would pass there then not pass in DRA... |
…10 updat…" (elastic#41269) This reverts commit 89ed20d. Due to ``` /usr/lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/6/../../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/ld.gold: internal error in maybe_apply_stub, at ../../gold/aarch64.cc:5407 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status ``` This building error occurred after the dependency update which this change reverts.
Reverts #41117
Due to
on the packaging pipeline that started happening after merging this update.
I managed to reproduce this error locally using the same command (needs to be run in the root of the Beats repo):
when I tried to revert my repository to a25c5a5 (latest successful packaging run on the CI before this change) the command succeeded.
So it's safe to say that this failure is due to 89ed20d