-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable labels dedotting in default docker module configuration #7485
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should be careful here as this ends up in 6.4 and docker module is in GA. So this change can only happen for 7.0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, @exekias and I talked about this, but we still thought that this could happen in 6.4, there are some reasons:
add_docker_metadata
[beta] processor is inconsistent with the provided configurations, and produces mapping conflicts. This alone could be considered a bug, as it breaks the initial experience.On the cons side, not dedotting can still produce mapping conflicts if a source uses labels with a subpath of other source (e.g.
foo.bar
andfoo.bar.baz
), so the user may still need some additional processors to handle these cases.We can also leave it as is, and point the users having problems to the options they have.
The ideal solution would be to be able to store the labels as they are, or with some kind of escaping for the dots that still allows to make queries in an intuitive way. But I don't know if something like this is possible with the current Stack.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree this is a breaking change, but it's also a soft one. Take into account we are only changing default configuration for the module, so already deployed modules won't change their behavior, this change only affects to new deployments.
I believe this should be the solution going forward, still, it is debatable if this should go to 6.4 or 7.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The good news for me is that it was uncommented previously so everyone using the default config will not experience any change. I think that is also the reason we had it there to have a simpler migration path in 7.0.
The broken user experience here is definitively a very strong point. I'm in general on board with making the breaking change especially as we have a config to keep the old behaviour. If we go forward, lets make sure we mention it not only in the changelog but also in the breaking changelog and what users need to change and some explanation.
As the processor is still in beta, could we bring it to GA? I think that would enforce our arguments on why we changed the defaults.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds like a plan to me 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I prepare another PR to make
add_docker_metadata
GA? 😄There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#7497