Remove invalid ips used in tests

[jsoriano]

What does this PR do?

elastic-package only allows the use of IPs that have geoip data in the included geoip database (see elastic/elastic-package#605).

Fields validation is only done with the first element when the field contains an array. In elastic/elastic-package#771 we are introducing the check for all elements in the array, what will make these packages to fail.

There are IPs in arrays that are not allowed by this check. Replace them.

Related issues

• Related to Add allowed ip check elastic-package#605
• Required by Check allowed values for fields elastic-package#771
• Fixes Packages using IPs not allowed for testing #3408

[jsoriano]

Will wait for elastic/elastic-package#826, to have more available ipv6 addresses, and to solve issues with addresses with leading zeroes.

[elasticmachine]

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

• Start Time: 2022-05-30T10:08:52.563+0000

• Duration: 66 min 10 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test	Results
Failed	0
Passed	686
Skipped	0
Total	686

🤖 GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

• /test : Re-trigger the build.

[elasticmachine]

🌐 Coverage report

Name	Metrics % (covered/total)	Diff
Packages	100.0% (55/55)	💚
Files	95.146% (98/103)	👎 -1.35
Classes	95.146% (98/103)	👎 -1.35
Methods	86.127% (894/1038)	👎 -3.234
Lines	93.258% (16116/17281)	👍 2.482
Conditionals	100.0% (0/0)	💚

[jsoriano]

Pending validation of IPv6 address will be fixed by elastic/elastic-package#826, opening this for review.

[efd6]

Where there are a number of IPv6 addresses in IP arrays and they are distinct and not in the first position (so not tagged as not-allowed under the current testing) I'd suggest to keep the distinctness so that they can be used to test fixes for allow_duplicates: false. This can be done with no loss of information by using RFC 4193 private IPs for those replacements.

[jsoriano]

@efd6 thanks for the review! I will wait then for elastic/elastic-package#826 so we can have different ipv6 addresses, and address your comments.

[jsoriano]

Open for review. @efd6 it'd be great if you could give it another look. Thanks!