Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: Chrome X-Pack UI Functional Tests.x-pack/test/functional/apps/index_management/index_templates_tab/index_template_tab·ts - Index Management app Index Management: index templates tab Index template tab can create an index template with logsdb index mode #205400

Closed
kibanamachine opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #205485
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Jan 2, 2025

A test failed on a tracked branch

Error: expected false to equal true
    at Assertion.assert (expect.js:100:11)
    at Assertion.apply (expect.js:227:8)
    at Assertion.be (expect.js:69:22)
    at Context.<anonymous> (index_template_tab.ts:80:62)
    at Object.apply (wrap_function.js:74:16)

First failure: kibana-on-merge - main

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label Jan 2, 2025
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jan 2, 2025
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more label Jan 2, 2025
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-management (Team:Kibana Management)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jan 2, 2025
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: kibana-on-merge - 8.x

kibanamachine pushed a commit to kibanamachine/kibana that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2025
Fixes: elastic#205535
Fixes: elastic#205514
Fixes: elastic#205498
Fixes: elastic#205464
Fixes: elastic#205456
Fixes: elastic#205453
Fixes: elastic#205450
Fixes: elastic#205412
Fixes: elastic#205410
Fixes: elastic#205401
Fixes: elastic#205400
Fixes: elastic#205399
Fixes: elastic#205350
Fixes: elastic#205349
Fixes: elastic#205316
Fixes: elastic#205288
Fixes: elastic#205287

## Summary
It seems that the step tabs are not loading fast enough for the tests to
find the expected element in a [bunch of
test](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Team%3AKibana%20Management%22%20label%3A%22failed-test%22%20created%3A%3E%40today-1w%20).
This PR attempt to fix it. It also adds the
`data-test-subj="indexModeValue"` tag in `TabSummary` that was missing.

(cherry picked from commit bcdf942)
crespocarlos pushed a commit to crespocarlos/kibana that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2025
Fixes: elastic#205535
Fixes: elastic#205514
Fixes: elastic#205498
Fixes: elastic#205464
Fixes: elastic#205456
Fixes: elastic#205453
Fixes: elastic#205450
Fixes: elastic#205412
Fixes: elastic#205410
Fixes: elastic#205401
Fixes: elastic#205400
Fixes: elastic#205399
Fixes: elastic#205350
Fixes: elastic#205349
Fixes: elastic#205316
Fixes: elastic#205288
Fixes: elastic#205287

## Summary
It seems that the step tabs are not loading fast enough for the tests to
find the expected element in a [bunch of
test](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Team%3AKibana%20Management%22%20label%3A%22failed-test%22%20created%3A%3E%40today-1w%20).
This PR attempt to fix it. It also adds the
`data-test-subj="indexModeValue"` tag in `TabSummary` that was missing.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants