Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.9] [Security Solution] Move test plans from /cypress to /docs (#161517) #161739

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2023

Conversation

banderror
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.9:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

…61517)

**Related to:** elastic/security-team#6867
(internal)

## Summary

As requested in
elastic#160685 (comment).

In test plans, we mention how scenarios are going to be automated --
whether a given scenario will be automated using Cypress for e2e tests,
Jest for integration tests and unit tests, etc. But currently, test
plans are under `x-pack/plugins/security_solution/cypress/`.

Since test plans are in fact technology agnostic, it does not make much
sense to keep them inside a specific framework technology folder. That's
why we're moving them to a generic
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/docs/testing` folder.

(cherry picked from commit 15a86c3)

# Conflicts:
#	.github/CODEOWNERS
@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Metrics [docs]

Unknown metric groups

ESLint disabled line counts

id before after diff
enterpriseSearch 13 15 +2
securitySolution 415 419 +4
total +6

Total ESLint disabled count

id before after diff
enterpriseSearch 14 16 +2
securitySolution 496 500 +4
total +6

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@banderror banderror merged commit ee95a11 into elastic:8.9 Jul 13, 2023
@banderror banderror deleted the backport/8.9/pr-161517 branch July 13, 2023 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants