-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Cloud Security][CIS GCP]Migration for new fields #167545
Conversation
… to Single account
…-ref HEAD~1..HEAD --fix'
…to cis-gcp-organization
…-ref HEAD~1..HEAD --fix'
…to cis-gcp-organization
…-ref HEAD~1..HEAD --fix'
…to cis-gcp-organization
…to cis-gcp-organization
…-ref HEAD~1..HEAD --fix'
Pinging @elastic/fleet (Team:Fleet) |
Pinging @elastic/kibana-cloud-security-posture (Team:Cloud Security) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, I believe we must create a new version - number 4
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it('if there are no cloud_security_posture package, do not change the doc', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
worth adding another test case - when the value is already set to something else, we don't set it to single-account
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ready to approve after the comments are addressed.
…cis-gcp-migration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM on CI green.
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Failed CI StepsTest Failures
Metrics [docs]
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
Summary
This PR is for migrating account.type fields for GCP when it doesnt have it