Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[kbn-test] improve check_ftr_configs script #189357

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2024

Conversation

dmlemeshko
Copy link
Member

@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko commented Jul 29, 2024

Summary

Follow-up to #188854

On CI script is taking >1 min, while before it was taking seconds.
Probably because 80+ files were loaded as potential FTR configs. I adjusted regular expressions to minimize the amount of files that we need to load to validate if it is FTR config or not.

In this CI run script took 20s (part of Quick Checks group)

@dmlemeshko
Copy link
Member Author

/ci

@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:skip This commit does not require backporting v8.16.0 labels Jul 29, 2024
@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2024 12:02
@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2024 12:02
// async function config({ readConfigFile }: FtrConfigProviderContext)
// export default async function (ftrConfigProviderContext: FtrConfigProviderContext)
fileContent.match(
/(?:export\s+default\s+)?async\s+function(?:\s+\w+)?\s*\(\s*(?:\{\s*readConfigFile\s*\}|\w+)\s*(?::\s*FtrConfigProviderContext\s*)?\)/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we name this? That's a lot of reading lol

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, I can put it into variable with comment

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that would be better than reading 115 characters lol

fileContent.match(/(testRunner)|(testFiles)/) ||
// export default createTestConfig
fileContent.match(/export\s+default\s+createTestConfig/) ||
// export default async function ({ readConfigFile }: FtrConfigProviderContext)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you wanna drop these comments?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would keep it so the next person working on it have an idea of what text we are searching in files. Maybe rephrase it?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Um, what do you mean?
Sounds like I'm missing something bud.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fileContent is a string with js/ts file content and we use regexp to find something that might tell if it is FTR config.
It is easy see an example that you can search repo with to find if some files still has the string, e.g. export default createTestConfig

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, nvm I get it.

Copy link
Member

@wayneseymour wayneseymour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@dmlemeshko dmlemeshko merged commit 0c45b11 into elastic:main Jul 29, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v8.16.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants