Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Remote clusters] Fix regression with xpack.remote_clusters.ui.enabled setting #57895

Merged

Conversation

alisonelizabeth
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes a regression caused by #57365, which inadvertently removed support for the xpack.remote_clusters.ui.enabled setting. This caused the following error when it was defined:

FATAL  Error: [config validation of [xpack.remote_clusters].ui]: definition for this key is missing

How to test

  1. Set xpack.remote_clusters.ui.enabled setting in your kibana.dev.yml file.
  2. Setting it to false should disable the remote_clusters UI, but the API should still be accessible.
  3. When true (default), the remote clusters UI should be enabled and behave as expected.

@alisonelizabeth alisonelizabeth added v8.0.0 Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v7.7.0 labels Feb 18, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/es-ui (Team:Elasticsearch UI)

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link
Contributor

@jloleysens jloleysens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more v7.7.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants