Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Security Solution][Exceptions] - Make esTypes and subType available to index patterns #72336
[Security Solution][Exceptions] - Make esTypes and subType available to index patterns #72336
Changes from 9 commits
952a105
4448734
c56a96d
f059d70
42de990
ebcb6d3
2861cfa
760ed31
548ead4
1e57353
f667704
7d5744f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit, can you just do:
return moment && moment.isValid()
? Won't that work as well without introducing the capital boolean boxing here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried removing it and the test yelled at me saying expected
boolean
notstring
. Leaving for now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This new object seems weird to me...Does this mean we only support ipv4 and not ipv6?
If this is only validating ipv4 but allowing ipv6 I am fine with it. If we begin hindering users or disallowing ipv6 though we are going to start to have issue relatively quickly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a bit of research and there isn't really great consensus on a good regex for ipv6. I didn't find a similar util like the one above for ipv4 in our code so I removed the validation here. I don't want to block users from adding exceptions. This can be something we can circle back on.