-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove pybind11 dependency from cpp library #40
Conversation
lib/ros_value.h
Outdated
namespace pybind11 { | ||
struct buffer_info; | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm forward declarations can be a dangerous hole to go down - Our style guide says to avoid them whenever possible https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Forward_Declarations
Why do you need the forward declaration here? Can you structure this in a way that doesn't need it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed! Since this is a 3rd party library, it might just be better to not have a forward declaration. Do you need RosValue::getPrimitiveArrayBufferInfo()
declaration in this file @liamembark? If not, then we can delete this forward declaration, I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ya so the underlying need for this is that the buffer_info object needs access to the underlying memory buffer, but this is a private member.
As a result, whatever is going to access this memory buffer needs to be declared along with the RosValue.
AFAIK this is always going to require forward declaration (if not let me know), but one alternative to forward declaring a piece of a third party library, I could instead forward declare a friend function that will be defined in the python library to provide access!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Liam I'll DM you to discuss this a bit, I think I understand the problem but want to dig in just a little more
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Fixes: DATA-622
Description of Changes
The library shouldn't be dependent on pybind11, only the python bindings should.
Test Plan
Unit tests.