-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[performance] only logLibraryVersions
in debug mode
#14829
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GavinJoyce
force-pushed
the
gj/skip-log-library-versions
branch
from
January 12, 2017 17:07
21d15f6
to
e029eeb
Compare
We should also remove the invocation here by wrapping in |
GavinJoyce
force-pushed
the
gj/skip-log-library-versions
branch
from
January 12, 2017 17:21
e029eeb
to
f742d97
Compare
GavinJoyce
changed the title
[wip][performance] only
[performance] only Jan 12, 2017
logLibraryVersions
in debug modelogLibraryVersions
in debug mode
locks
reviewed
Jan 12, 2017
@@ -339,7 +340,7 @@ const Application = Engine.extend({ | |||
} | |||
|
|||
registerLibraries(); | |||
logLibraryVersions(); | |||
runInDebug(() => logLibraryVersions()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need this with the no-opping body?
See Robert's comment above
…On 12 Jan 2017 5:37 p.m., "Ricardo Mendes" ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In packages/ember-application/lib/system/application.js
<#14829 (review)>
:
> @@ -339,7 +340,7 @@ const Application = Engine.extend({
}
registerLibraries();
- logLibraryVersions();
+ runInDebug(() => logLibraryVersions());
do we need this with the no-opping body?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#14829 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAJ3j3bAs_QlTHd4C8ZzKxa4UqKDez2ks5rRmTWgaJpZM4Lh-eI>
.
|
locks
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2017
rwjblue
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2017
LGTM, will land once CI is finished. |
🍏 🚢 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TODO: