Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added possibility for = in extra annotations defined in excelparser #752

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2024

Conversation

francescalb
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

For each annotation it is now allowed to have = in the string that is added.

It is tested in the excel2onto test which checks that the created ontology is correct (small change in one of the annotations there).

Type of change

  • Bug fix.
  • New feature.
  • Documentation update.
  • Test update.

Checklist

This checklist can be used as a help for the reviewer.

  • Is the code easy to read and understand?
  • Are comments for humans to read, not computers to disregard?
  • Does a new feature has an accompanying new test (in the CI or unit testing schemes)?
  • Has the documentation been updated as necessary?
  • Does this close the issue?
  • Is the change limited to the issue?
  • Are errors handled for all outcomes?
  • Does the new feature provide new restrictions on dependencies, and if so is this documented?

Comments

@francescalb francescalb linked an issue Apr 24, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.21%. Comparing base (79c15ff) to head (c553104).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #752      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.18%   72.21%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        3462     3462              
==========================================
+ Hits         2499     2500       +1     
+ Misses        963      962       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jesper-friis jesper-friis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@francescalb francescalb merged commit bd4e3d6 into master Apr 26, 2024
12 checks passed
@francescalb francescalb deleted the allow_for_=_in_extra_annotations branch April 26, 2024 08:05
francescalb added a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…752)

# Description
For each annotation it is now allowed to have = in the string that is
added.

It is tested in the excel2onto test which checks that the created
ontology is correct (small change in one of the annotations there).

## Type of change
<!-- Put an `x` in the box that applies. -->
- [ ] Bug fix.
- [ ] New feature.
- [ ] Documentation update.
- [ ] Test update.

## Checklist
<!-- Put an `x` in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out
after creating the PR. -->

This checklist can be used as a help for the reviewer.

- [ ] Is the code easy to read and understand?
- [ ] Are comments for humans to read, not computers to disregard?
- [ ] Does a new feature has an accompanying new test (in the CI or unit
testing schemes)?
- [ ] Has the documentation been updated as necessary?
- [ ] Does this close the issue?
- [ ] Is the change limited to the issue?
- [ ] Are errors handled for all outcomes?
- [ ] Does the new feature provide new restrictions on dependencies, and
if so is this documented?

## Comments
<!-- Additional comments here, including clarifications on checklist if
applicable. -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

excelparser, allow for = in strings for other annotations.
2 participants