Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove -upstream component of SDK names #1166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove -upstream component of SDK names #1166

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2023

Conversation

sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbc100 sbc100 commented Jan 10, 2023

This name existed to distinguish the SDK from fastcomp, but as of #1165, we no longer support fastcomp.

@sbc100 sbc100 requested review from dschuff and kripken January 10, 2023 11:47
@sbc100 sbc100 force-pushed the remove_upstream branch 2 times, most recently from dc82f07 to fa3aa8f Compare January 10, 2023 12:16
@kripken
Copy link
Member

kripken commented Jan 10, 2023

Is this a breaking change? If so, can we strip -upstream from user inputs?

@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sbc100 commented Jan 10, 2023

Is this a breaking change? If so, can we strip -upstream from user inputs?

Yes, the -upstream is still supported in the user inputs but its basically ignores (we strip it off on 2706).

@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sbc100 commented Jan 10, 2023

Is this a breaking change? If so, can we strip -upstream from user inputs?

Yes, the -upstream is still supported in the user inputs but its basically ignores (we strip it off on 2706).

Because the old names are still supported I think this is a backwards compatible change.

@kripken
Copy link
Member

kripken commented Jan 11, 2023

Sounds good. Not sure why the tests fail then, you are right that that line should be stripping the suffix.

@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sbc100 commented Jan 13, 2023

ping.. ok to land once tests pass?

@kripken
Copy link
Member

kripken commented Jan 13, 2023

Lgtm, but please add a test (or keep one) that checks we strip -upstream properly, if you haven't already.

This name existed to distinguish the SDK from fastcomp, but as of #1165,
we no longer support fastcomp.
@sbc100 sbc100 merged commit 1eaaa4c into main Jan 14, 2023
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the remove_upstream branch January 14, 2023 04:11
sbc100 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2023
The name `upstream` doesn't have any meaning anymore now that there is
no more fastcomp.  It was removed from the SDK names in #1166 and this
is the last usage of that name/term.
sbc100 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2023
The name `upstream` doesn't have any meaning anymore now that there is
no more fastcomp.  It was removed from the SDK names in #1166 and this
is the last usage of that name/term.
sbc100 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2023
The name `upstream` doesn't have any meaning anymore now that there is
no more fastcomp.  It was removed from the SDK names in #1166 and this
is the last usage of that name/term.
sbc100 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2023
The name `upstream` doesn't have any meaning anymore now that there is
no more fastcomp.  It was removed from the SDK names in #1166 and this
is the last usage of that name/term.
sbc100 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2023
sbc100 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2023
shlomif pushed a commit to shlomif/emsdk that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
This name existed to distinguish the SDK from fastcomp, but as of emscripten-core#1165,
we no longer support fastcomp.
shlomif pushed a commit to shlomif/emsdk that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants