Add poster and registration information.

content/en/lecture/2024.md

@@ -17,4 +17,10 @@ Huaping Lu-Adler is a professor of philosophy at Georgetown University. She was
 
 #### Abstract
 
-On Kant’s account, “public use of reason” is the use that a truth-seeking scholar makes of his reason when he communicates his thoughts *in writing* to a world of *readers*. Commentators tend to treat this account as expressing an egalitarian ideal, without taking seriously the limiting conditions—especially the scholarship condition—built into it. In this paper, I interrogate Kant’s original account of public reason in connection with his construction of the “Oriental” as a linguistically and therefore epistemically and culturally inferior Other. I thereby give reasons to worry that Kant’s account is substantively inegalitarian (even if it is nominally egalitarian). I also draw attention to the fact that Kant constructed a linguistic Other against the backdrop of colonialism and from a position of power. This positionality gave what he said about the Other an ideology-forming and world-making effect. In this way, his exclusionary discursive practices—such as depicting the Oriental as an inferior linguistic Other—could have a lasting impact on knowledge production and on the real-world exercise of public reason. 
+On Kant’s account, “public use of reason” is the use that a truth-seeking scholar makes of his reason when he communicates his thoughts *in writing* to a world of *readers*. Commentators tend to treat this account as expressing an egalitarian ideal, without taking seriously the limiting conditions—especially the scholarship condition—built into it. In this paper, I interrogate Kant’s original account of public reason in connection with his construction of the “Oriental” as a linguistically and therefore epistemically and culturally inferior Other. I thereby give reasons to worry that Kant’s account is substantively inegalitarian (even if it is nominally egalitarian). I also draw attention to the fact that Kant constructed a linguistic Other against the backdrop of colonialism and from a position of power. This positionality gave what he said about the Other an ideology-forming and world-making effect. In this way, his exclusionary discursive practices—such as depicting the Oriental as an inferior linguistic Other—could have a lasting impact on knowledge production and on the real-world exercise of public reason. 
+
+#### Register
+
+The inaugural Shanghai Lecture in Philosophy will take place on Friday 10 May 2024 at 3-5pm in the N107 Auditorium at NYU Shanghai. [Click here](https://events.shanghai.nyu.edu/#!view/event/date/20240510/event_id/6327) to register to attend, or scan the barcode in the poster below. If you are not able to attend, the lecture will later be made available [here](https://www.youtube.com/@shanghai-lecture).
+
+{{< figure src="/images/2024-lu-adler-poster.jpg" class="w-100 center">}}

content/zh/lecture/2024.md

@@ -17,4 +17,10 @@ Huaping Lu-Adler is a professor of philosophy at Georgetown University. She was
 
 #### Abstract
 
-On Kant’s account, “public use of reason” is the use that a truth-seeking scholar makes of his reason when he communicates his thoughts *in writing* to a world of *readers*. Commentators tend to treat this account as expressing an egalitarian ideal, without taking seriously the limiting conditions—especially the scholarship condition—built into it. In this paper, I interrogate Kant’s original account of public reason in connection with his construction of the “Oriental” as a linguistically and therefore epistemically and culturally inferior Other. I thereby give reasons to worry that Kant’s account is substantively inegalitarian (even if it is nominally egalitarian). I also draw attention to the fact that Kant constructed a linguistic Other against the backdrop of colonialism and from a position of power. This positionality gave what he said about the Other an ideology-forming and world-making effect. In this way, his exclusionary discursive practices—such as depicting the Oriental as an inferior linguistic Other—could have a lasting impact on knowledge production and on the real-world exercise of public reason. 
+On Kant’s account, “public use of reason” is the use that a truth-seeking scholar makes of his reason when he communicates his thoughts *in writing* to a world of *readers*. Commentators tend to treat this account as expressing an egalitarian ideal, without taking seriously the limiting conditions—especially the scholarship condition—built into it. In this paper, I interrogate Kant’s original account of public reason in connection with his construction of the “Oriental” as a linguistically and therefore epistemically and culturally inferior Other. I thereby give reasons to worry that Kant’s account is substantively inegalitarian (even if it is nominally egalitarian). I also draw attention to the fact that Kant constructed a linguistic Other against the backdrop of colonialism and from a position of power. This positionality gave what he said about the Other an ideology-forming and world-making effect. In this way, his exclusionary discursive practices—such as depicting the Oriental as an inferior linguistic Other—could have a lasting impact on knowledge production and on the real-world exercise of public reason. 
+
+#### Register
+
+The inaugural Shanghai Lecture in Philosophy will take place on Friday 10 May 2024 at 3-5pm in the N107 Auditorium at NYU Shanghai. [Click here](https://events.shanghai.nyu.edu/#!view/event/date/20240510/event_id/6327) to register to attend, or scan the barcode in the poster below. If you are not able to attend, the lecture will later be made available [here](https://www.youtube.com/@shanghai-lecture).
+
+{{< figure src="/images/2024-lu-adler-poster.jpg" class="w-100 center">}}