Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: SuperchainWETH test flake #13115

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

smartcontracts
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes a flake that existed inside of the SuperchainWETH test suite. Was caught by the heavy fuzz test.

Fixes a flake that existed inside of the SuperchainWETH test suite.
Was caught by the heavy fuzz test.
@smartcontracts smartcontracts requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2024 04:27
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 42.72%. Comparing base (72eb311) to head (a101d6f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #13115      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    44.46%   42.72%   -1.75%     
===========================================
  Files          798      742      -56     
  Lines        71682    67017    -4665     
===========================================
- Hits         31874    28630    -3244     
+ Misses       37224    35980    -1244     
+ Partials      2584     2407     -177     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests-32 ?
cannon-go-tests-64 ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 65 files with indirect coverage changes

@smartcontracts smartcontracts added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 9109958 Nov 27, 2024
45 checks passed
@smartcontracts smartcontracts deleted the sc/superchain-weth-test-fix branch November 27, 2024 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants