Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removes support for legacy transactions. #2725

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2020

Conversation

MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

  • Changes legacy transactions to no longer be supported.
  • Explicitly calls out that these changes are for devp2p (which implies they don't necessarily apply to JSON-RPC).
  • Changes second item to be opaque bytes rather than an RLP array.
  • Adds some rationale from discussions around alternative options and the standard defined prior to this PR.

* Changes legacy transactions to no longer be supported.
* Explicitly calls out that these changes are for devp2p (which implies they don't necessarily apply to JSON-RPC).
* Changes second item to be opaque bytes rather than an RLP array.
* Adds some rationale from discussions around alternative options and the standard defined prior to this PR.
@eip-automerger eip-automerger merged commit 3bcf64d into ethereum:master Jun 15, 2020
@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu deleted the patch-3 branch June 15, 2020 12:22
tkstanczak pushed a commit to tkstanczak/EIPs that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2020
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
Arachnid pushed a commit to Arachnid/EIPs that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2021
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants