Update EIP-1: Fix outdated links

[donBarbos]

updated invalid links to new paths

[eth-bot]

Hi! I'm a bot, and I wanted to automerge your PR, but couldn't because of the following issue(s):

---

(fail) eip-1.md

classification
updateEIP

• Changes to EIP 1 require at least 5 unique approvals from editors; there's currently 1 approvals; the remaining editors are @lightclient, @axic, @SamWilsn, @gcolvin

[xinbenlv]

LGTM other than suggest using link to a specific commit when possible.

[Pandapip1]

For the sake of not dragging this out, you don't have to make @xinbenlv's change. It would certainly be preferred, but it's probably best to just stop linking to nonexistent pages in the first place.

[xinbenlv]

@Pandapip1 personally, I feel these links being touched are helpful. IMHO Updating the links as opposed to removing the links is great. The links exist to give references to the content and I think they are all proper links. (cc: @gcolvin @lightclient)

@donBarbos here is a little context that editors are debating whether linking to external links shall be allowed or to what extent. See #5597. You might (and IMHO, are encouraged to) make your judgement about whether links are helpful and should continue to exist in EIP-1.

[Pandapip1]

@Pandapip1 personally, I feel these links being touched are helpful. IMHO Updating the links as opposed to removing the links is great. The links exist to give references to the content and I think they are all proper links. (cc: @gcolvin @lightclient)

I was agreeing. I was just saying that a speedy merge was preferable to not making any changes.