-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update EIP-3475: Changing comments #5789
Update EIP-3475: Changing comments #5789
Conversation
grammer refactor Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>
refactor Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>
A critical exception has occurred: |
Could you explain the changes you're making to this EIP? It's in the final state, so generally we don't allow updates. |
hi @SamWilsn , we wanted to rectify the description of the example information that is defined in the interface as many developers were having hard time understanding the notations like [1,10,00] storage of the Transaction tuple, which is shown as the pseudo-code , but other readers who were developing on the standard were getting errors. so the changes are only in the descriptions and never change either the function interface or standard |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are non-normative changes, so this is fine.
There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review. |
ah sorry didnt checked this PR issue, ok I will close this one and re-create a new PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this is fine. These do not change the spec.
No need. Not sure why this didn't merge the 1st time. |
* some minor description changes in interface and example implemenation. * rectifying description of the array struct. * Update assets/eip-3475/interfaces/IERC3475.sol grammer refactor Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> * Update assets/eip-3475/interfaces/IERC3475.sol Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> * Update assets/eip-3475/interfaces/IERC3475.sol Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> * Update assets/eip-3475/interfaces/IERC3475.sol refactor Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> * refactoring and addressing ambiguous descriptions * refactor * refactor final * adding correct syntax and all refactoring done !! * spaces and refactoring * update Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> * adding the comments in the interfaces from the standard description. * separating the examples for events, decluttering. * updating the example class name * removing redundant metadata description. * refactor the standard based on feedback PR ethereum#6128 * add example * modified: EIPS/eip-3475.md - Rectifying the example on explaining the approval function(L#126). - Changing the formatting of subheadings in rational to be better visiblity and linting. (L#268). - Rectifying the definition of `event Redeem()` to include transaction struct parameter. (L#297). - Linting suggestion(L#346,L#385, L#404). - Re-writing the sentence that defines the rational of having metadata structure(L#365) modified: assets/eip-3475/ERC3475.sol - clarifying the correct definition of value in metadata. Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]>
description defined in the interface file.