-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core, eth, les: more efficient hash-based header chain retrieval #16946
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ type BlockChain interface { | |
InsertHeaderChain(chain []*types.Header, checkFreq int) (int, error) | ||
Rollback(chain []common.Hash) | ||
GetHeaderByNumber(number uint64) *types.Header | ||
GetBlockHashesFromHash(hash common.Hash, max uint64) []common.Hash | ||
GetAncestor(hash common.Hash, number, ancestor uint64, maxNonCanonical *uint64) (common.Hash, uint64) | ||
Genesis() *types.Block | ||
SubscribeChainHeadEvent(ch chan<- core.ChainHeadEvent) event.Subscription | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ func (pm *ProtocolManager) handleMsg(p *peer) error { | |
} | ||
|
||
hashMode := query.Origin.Hash != (common.Hash{}) | ||
first := true | ||
maxNonCanonical := uint64(100) | ||
|
||
// Gather headers until the fetch or network limits is reached | ||
var ( | ||
|
@@ -429,29 +431,34 @@ func (pm *ProtocolManager) handleMsg(p *peer) error { | |
// Retrieve the next header satisfying the query | ||
var origin *types.Header | ||
if hashMode { | ||
origin = pm.blockchain.GetHeaderByHash(query.Origin.Hash) | ||
if first { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. exactly the same code as also just introduced here: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/16946/files#diff-74cea5b79d38ad655dd2c0b1279bc7e7R356 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Makes sense but I wanted to do the least amount of change in this hotfix PR. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ACK - perhaps create a follow-up refactoring issue then to not forget about it ?-) |
||
first = false | ||
origin = pm.blockchain.GetHeaderByHash(query.Origin.Hash) | ||
if origin != nil { | ||
query.Origin.Number = origin.Number.Uint64() | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
origin = pm.blockchain.GetHeader(query.Origin.Hash, query.Origin.Number) | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
origin = pm.blockchain.GetHeaderByNumber(query.Origin.Number) | ||
} | ||
if origin == nil { | ||
break | ||
} | ||
number := origin.Number.Uint64() | ||
headers = append(headers, origin) | ||
bytes += estHeaderRlpSize | ||
|
||
// Advance to the next header of the query | ||
switch { | ||
case hashMode && query.Reverse: | ||
// Hash based traversal towards the genesis block | ||
for i := 0; i < int(query.Skip)+1; i++ { | ||
if header := pm.blockchain.GetHeader(query.Origin.Hash, number); header != nil { | ||
query.Origin.Hash = header.ParentHash | ||
number-- | ||
} else { | ||
unknown = true | ||
break | ||
} | ||
ancestor := query.Skip + 1 | ||
if ancestor == 0 { | ||
unknown = true | ||
} else { | ||
query.Origin.Hash, query.Origin.Number = pm.blockchain.GetAncestor(query.Origin.Hash, query.Origin.Number, ancestor, &maxNonCanonical) | ||
unknown = (query.Origin.Hash == common.Hash{}) | ||
} | ||
case hashMode && !query.Reverse: | ||
// Hash based traversal towards the leaf block | ||
|
@@ -465,8 +472,10 @@ func (pm *ProtocolManager) handleMsg(p *peer) error { | |
unknown = true | ||
} else { | ||
if header := pm.blockchain.GetHeaderByNumber(next); header != nil { | ||
if pm.blockchain.GetBlockHashesFromHash(header.Hash(), query.Skip+1)[query.Skip] == query.Origin.Hash { | ||
query.Origin.Hash = header.Hash() | ||
nextHash := header.Hash() | ||
expOldHash, _ := pm.blockchain.GetAncestor(nextHash, next, query.Skip+1, &maxNonCanonical) | ||
if expOldHash == query.Origin.Hash { | ||
query.Origin.Hash, query.Origin.Number = nextHash, next | ||
} else { | ||
unknown = true | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will trigger for
skip == 0
and number of requests > 192.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All in all I think it's too convoluted that you have special case handling for
skip == 0
merged in with the other case seamlessly. Ifskip == 0
is to be handled explicitly, please do so in a prior loop. I think it's much cleaner to have the two cases separate than together.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used the same downloader.MaxHeaderFetch that limits the number of headers retrieved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a client side limit, not a server side one. There was no such limit beforehand.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You might be right about the skip==0 case though. I'm changing it now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also why convolute the concepts of max header count with max canonical headers? They have nothing to do with each other.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only reason is the case you just mentioned. Ugly solution, I know :) I'll push the new version in a few minutes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done