🧪 Test: Add more procedures tests #1247
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@roninjin10 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughA new function Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant BlockchainModule
participant BlockchainRPC
User->>BlockchainModule: Call getBlockFromRpc({ blockTag, transport }, common)
BlockchainModule->>BlockchainRPC: Request block data (blockTag, transport)
BlockchainRPC-->>BlockchainModule: Return block data (Block)
BlockchainModule-->>User: Return Promise<Block>
Poem
Tip Early access features: enabledWe are currently testing the following features in early access:
Note:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. Join @roninjin10 and the rest of your teammates on |
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
06-27-_test_tube_test_add_more_procedures_tests
branch
from
eae7aa4 to
2c8b698
Compare
roninjin10
changed the base branch from
main
to
06-27-_sparkles_feat_add_prefunded_accounts_to_tevm_utils
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 31
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (11)
packages/procedures/src/__snapshots__/createHandlers.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/dumpstate/__snapshots__/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/setaccount/__snapshots__/setAccountProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (31)
- packages/blockchain/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/call/callProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/dumpstate/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetFilterChangesProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethSignTransactionProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethUninstallFilterProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/gasPriceProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getBalanceProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getCodeProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getStorageAtProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/getaccount/getAccountProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/loadstate/loadStateProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/mine/mineProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/script/scriptProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/setaccount/setAccountProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/blockToJsonRpcBlock.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/generateRandomId.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/parseBlockTag.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/txToJsonRpcTx.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (2)
- packages/procedures/src/setaccount/setAccountProcedure.spec.ts (no review received)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getStorageAtProcedure.spec.ts (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/blockchain/src/index.ts
Additional context used
Biome
packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts
[error] 10-10: This variable implicitly has the any type.
Variable declarations without type annotation and initialization implicitly have the any type. Declare a type or initialize the variable with some value.
(lint/suspicious/noImplicitAnyLet)
Additional comments not posted (41)
packages/procedures/src/utils/generateRandomId.spec.ts (1)
4-15: Well-structured tests forgenerateRandomId.The tests adequately verify both the format and the uniqueness of the IDs generated by the
generateRandomIdfunction.packages/procedures/src/utils/blockToJsonRpcBlock.spec.ts (1)
7-19: Tests use snapshot matching for complex outputs.While snapshot tests are effective for complex data structures, they can be brittle if the underlying data changes often. Consider adding more granular assertions if the output format is stable.
packages/procedures/src/script/scriptProcedure.spec.ts (1)
14-33: Basic assertions in place forscriptProcedure.The test effectively checks for error-free execution and result definition. Consider adding more detailed assertions to capture specific behaviors or outputs of the script execution process.
packages/procedures/src/utils/txToJsonRpcTx.spec.ts (1)
9-29: Comprehensive test fortxToJsonRpcTx.The setup and execution of the test are thorough, effectively capturing the transformation of transaction data into the JSON-RPC format. Snapshot testing is appropriately used here given the complexity and variety of the data involved.
[APROVED]packages/procedures/src/dumpstate/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts (1)
13-40: Detailed and comprehensive test fordumpStateProcedure.The test thoroughly sets up the state and validates the procedure's response, ensuring that all aspects of the state dumping process are covered. The assertions are well-targeted, checking for both the presence of expected results and the correctness of response properties.
packages/procedures/src/utils/parseBlockTag.spec.ts (1)
5-43: Comprehensive Test Coverage forparseBlockTagThe test suite covers a variety of cases, ensuring that the function handles different types of inputs correctly. This includes hex numbers, block hashes, special tags, and direct number inputs. It's good to see thorough testing, especially for utility functions that are critical in blockchain operations.
packages/procedures/src/eth/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts (1)
12-43: Effective Testing ofchainIdProcedureThe tests validate the functionality of the
chainIdProcedureeffectively, ensuring that both scenarios with and without an ID are handled correctly. UsingtoMatchSnapshotis a good choice for ensuring that the output remains consistent across tests. However, ensure that the snapshots are up-to-date and accurately reflect the expected results.packages/procedures/src/eth/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1)
12-43: Thorough Testing ofblockNumberProcedureThe test suite for
blockNumberProcedureis well-structured, covering scenarios with and without an ID effectively. UsingtoMatchSnapshotensures that the responses are consistent with expectations. It's important to keep these snapshots up-to-date to avoid false positives in future tests.packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts (1)
12-43: Comprehensive Testing ofethCoinbaseJsonRpcProcedureThe test cases for
ethCoinbaseJsonRpcProcedureare comprehensive, covering both scenarios with and without an ID. The use oftoMatchSnapshotis appropriate here to ensure the consistency of the responses. Continue to monitor the accuracy of these snapshots to maintain test reliability.
[APROVED]packages/procedures/src/eth/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts (1)
11-58: Robust Testing ofethBlobBaseFeeJsonRpcProcedureThe tests for
ethBlobBaseFeeJsonRpcProcedureeffectively cover different scenarios, including those with additional parameters. This ensures that the procedure is robust against various types of inputs. The use oftoMatchSnapshothere is crucial for maintaining consistency in the expected outputs.packages/procedures/src/loadstate/loadStateProcedure.spec.ts (2)
1-4: Code Imports ReviewThe imports are correctly structured and relevant to the file's functionality.
8-10: Base Client Initialization inbeforeEachInitializing
clientinbeforeEachensures a clean state for each test, which is a good practice.packages/procedures/src/mine/mineProcedure.spec.ts (2)
1-4: Code Imports ReviewThe imports are correctly structured and relevant to the file's functionality.
8-10: Base Client Initialization inbeforeEachInitializing
clientinbeforeEachensures a clean state for each test, which is a good practice.packages/procedures/package.json (1)
70-76: Dependency Updates ReviewThe addition of
@tevm/blockchainand the version update for@tevm/test-utilsare consistent with the stated changes. Ensure that these versions are compatible with other parts of the project.Verification successful
Dependency Updates Review
The addition of
@tevm/blockchainand the version update for@tevm/test-utilsare consistent with the stated changes. Ensure that these versions are compatible with other parts of the project.
- The version for
@tevm/blockchainis consistently set to"workspace:^"across the packages.- The version for
@tevm/test-utilsis updated to"2.0.0-next.86"inpackages/procedures/package.jsonand is also mentioned as"workspace:^"in another package.The updates appear consistent and compatible across the project.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the new dependency versions are compatible with other parts of the project. cat packages/*/package.json | jq '.dependencies'Length of output: 5449
packages/procedures/src/eth/ethUninstallFilterProcedure.spec.ts (2)
1-4: Code Imports ReviewThe imports are correctly structured and relevant to the file's functionality.
10-24: Filter Setup and Uninstallation TestsThe setup in
beforeEachis thorough, preparing multiple filter states. The tests for uninstalling filters check both presence and absence, which is comprehensive.packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1)
1-4: Code Imports ReviewThe imports are correctly structured and relevant to the file's functionality.
packages/procedures/src/eth/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts (3)
12-33: Test Case Review: "should estimate gas successfully"The test setup and execution seem correct and effectively validate the success path. However, using snapshots can sometimes lead to brittle tests if not managed carefully.
Consider verifying whether snapshot tests are the best approach here, or if explicit value checks could be more maintainable.
35-55: Test Case Review: "should handle errors from callProcedure"The test case effectively simulates error conditions and checks for the absence of a result, which is good. However, consider adding more explicit checks on the nature of the error to ensure it matches expected error conditions.
57-76: Test Case Review: "should handle requests without an id"The test is well-structured and checks important behavior when the 'id' field is missing. Again, consider the implications of using snapshots for testing and whether more explicit assertions could be beneficial.
Review the use of snapshot testing in this scenario for maintainability.
packages/procedures/src/eth/gasPriceProcedure.spec.ts (1)
61-85: Test Case Review: "should handle errors from gasPriceHandler"The test case effectively simulates an error condition by manipulating the client's behavior. Consider adding more explicit checks on the nature of the error to ensure it matches expected error conditions.
packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (3)
12-27: Test Case Review: "should return block details by number"The test setup and execution seem correct and effectively validate the retrieval of block details based on the block number. However, using snapshots can sometimes lead to brittle tests if not managed carefully.
Consider verifying whether snapshot tests are the best approach here, or if explicit value checks could be more maintainable.
29-43: Test Case Review: "should include transactions if requested"The test case effectively checks the inclusion of transactions in the block details, which is a critical aspect of blockchain functionality. Again, consider the implications of using snapshots for testing and whether more explicit assertions could be beneficial.
Review the use of snapshot testing in this scenario for maintainability.
45-58: Test Case Review: "should handle requests without an id"The test is well-structured and checks important behavior when the 'id' field is missing. Again, consider the implications of using snapshots for testing and whether more explicit assertions could be beneficial.
Review the use of snapshot testing in this scenario for maintainability.
packages/procedures/src/eth/getBalanceProcedure.spec.ts (1)
53-62: Test Case Review: "should return an error if the block parameter is missing"The test case effectively simulates an error condition by omitting the block parameter. Consider adding more explicit checks on the nature of the error to ensure it matches expected error conditions.
packages/procedures/src/eth/ethSignTransactionProcedure.spec.ts (3)
13-40: Test Case Review: "should sign a transaction successfully"The test setup and execution seem correct and effectively validate the transaction signing process. However, using snapshots can sometimes lead to brittle tests if not managed carefully.
Consider verifying whether snapshot tests are the best approach here, or if explicit value checks could be more maintainable.
42-67: Test Case Review: "should handle requests without an id"This test case effectively checks the procedure's behavior when the 'id' is missing, which is important for robustness. Again, consider the implications of using snapshots for testing and whether more explicit assertions could be beneficial.
Review the use of snapshot testing in this scenario for maintainability.
69-94: Test Case Review: "should handle errors from ethSignTransactionHandler"The test case effectively simulates an error condition by providing an invalid address. Consider adding more explicit checks on the nature of the error to ensure it matches expected error conditions.
packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts (3)
41-60: Good coverage for minimal input scenarios.This test case effectively checks how
ethCallProcedurehandles requests with missing optional fields, ensuring the procedure's robustness in handling different types of input.
63-84: Proper testing of error handling in failure scenarios.This test case correctly simulates an error condition by providing invalid parameters and checks for appropriate error handling, ensuring the procedure's reliability under failure conditions.
87-105: Effective testing of JSON-RPC compliance for requests without an ID.This test case effectively ensures that
ethCallProcedurecan handle requests without anid, which is a crucial aspect of JSON-RPC where IDs are not strictly required for notifications.packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts (5)
27-42: Good coverage for typicaleth_callscenarios.This test case effectively checks how the handler processes an
eth_callrequest with typical parameters, ensuring the handler's robustness in handling different types of input.
45-53: Proper testing ofeth_getBalancehandler functionality.This test case correctly simulates a typical balance query scenario and checks for appropriate handling, ensuring the handler's reliability under typical use cases.
84-98: Good coverage foreth_estimateGasscenarios.This test case effectively checks how the handler processes an
eth_estimateGasrequest with typical parameters, ensuring the handler's robustness in handling different types of input.
122-128: Good coverage foreth_miningscenarios.This test case effectively checks how the handler processes an
eth_miningrequest, ensuring the handler's robustness in handling different types of input.
131-137: Good coverage foreth_syncingscenarios.This test case effectively checks how the handler processes an
eth_syncingrequest, ensuring the handler's robustness in handling different types of input.packages/procedures/src/eth/getCodeProcedure.spec.ts (2)
59-82: Effective testing of JSON-RPC compliance for requests without an ID.This test case effectively ensures that
getCodeProcedurecan handle requests without anid, which is a crucial aspect of JSON-RPC where IDs are not strictly required for notifications.
85-109: Proper testing of error handling in failure scenarios.This test case correctly simulates an error condition by providing an invalid address and checks for appropriate error handling, ensuring the procedure's reliability under failure conditions.
packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1)
60-99: Good Coverage for Requests without an IDThis test case effectively checks the procedure's handling of requests without an
id. It ensures that the procedure adheres to the JSON-RPC specification by not requiring anidfield.packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1)
60-99: Good Coverage for Requests without an IDThis test case effectively checks the procedure's handling of requests without an
id, ensuring compliance with the JSON-RPC specification.
| describe('loadStateProcedure', () => { | ||
| it('should load state successfully', async () => { | ||
| const request: LoadStateJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_loadState', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: [ | ||
| { | ||
| state: { | ||
| '0x1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12345678': { | ||
| nonce: '0x1', | ||
| balance: '0x10', | ||
| storageRoot: '0x1234', | ||
| codeHash: '0x5678', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await loadStateProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('tevm_loadState') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it('should handle state loading with multiple accounts', async () => { | ||
| const request: LoadStateJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_loadState', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: [ | ||
| { | ||
| state: { | ||
| '0x1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12345678': { | ||
| nonce: '0x1', | ||
| balance: '0x10', | ||
| storageRoot: '0x1234', | ||
| codeHash: '0x5678', | ||
| }, | ||
| '0xabcdefabcdefabcdefabcdefabcdefabcdefabcd': { | ||
| nonce: '0x2', | ||
| balance: '0x20', | ||
| storageRoot: '0x5678', | ||
| codeHash: '0x1234', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await loadStateProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('tevm_loadState') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Comprehensive Testing of loadStateProcedure
The tests cover various scenarios, including single and multiple account states. The use of async/await is appropriate, and the assertions are well-placed to validate the behavior of the procedure.
However, consider adding negative test cases or edge cases to ensure the procedure's robustness under unexpected conditions.
| describe('mineProcedure', () => { | ||
| it('should mine a block successfully', async () => { | ||
| const request: MineJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_mine', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: ['0x1', '0x0'], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await mineProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('tevm_mine') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it('should handle mining multiple blocks', async () => { | ||
| const request: MineJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_mine', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: ['0x5', '0x0'], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await mineProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('tevm_mine') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it('should handle mining with interval', async () => { | ||
| const request: MineJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_mine', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: ['0x1', '0x3E8'], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await mineProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('tevm_mine') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it('should handle errors from mineHandler', async () => { | ||
| // Simulate an error in mineHandler by providing invalid parameters or mocking mineHandler | ||
| const request: MineJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_mine', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: ['0x0', '0x0'], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await mineProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.error).toMatchSnapshot() | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Comprehensive Testing of mineProcedure
The tests cover various scenarios including single block mining, multiple blocks, and interval-based mining. The structure of the tests is consistent and logical.
Consider adding more detailed assertions to verify the state changes or effects of mining, beyond just checking the response structure.
| it('should handle requests without an id', async () => { | ||
| const request: EthUninstallFilterJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'eth_uninstallFilter', | ||
| params: [filterId], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await ethUninstallFilterJsonRpcProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBe(true) | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('eth_uninstallFilter') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(client.getFilters().has(filterId)).toBe(false) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handling Requests Without an ID
Testing the procedure's behavior without an ID is important for robustness, but also ensure that the system handles other types of malformed requests.
| describe('ethGetBlockByHashJsonRpcProcedure', () => { | ||
| it('should return block details by hash', async () => { | ||
| const request: EthGetBlockByHashJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'eth_getBlockByHash', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: [ | ||
| '0x1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef', // Example block hash | ||
| false, // Do not include transactions | ||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await ethGetBlockByHashJsonRpcProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('eth_getBlockByHash') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| expect(response.result).toMatchSnapshot() | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it('should include transactions if requested', async () => { | ||
| const request: EthGetBlockByHashJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'eth_getBlockByHash', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: [ | ||
| '0x1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef', // Example block hash | ||
| true, // Include transactions | ||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await ethGetBlockByHashJsonRpcProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('eth_getBlockByHash') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| expect(response.result).toMatchSnapshot() | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| it('should handle requests without an id', async () => { | ||
| const request: EthGetBlockByHashJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'eth_getBlockByHash', | ||
| params: [ | ||
| '0x1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef', // Example block hash | ||
| false, // Do not include transactions | ||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await ethGetBlockByHashJsonRpcProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('eth_getBlockByHash') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toMatchSnapshot() | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Comprehensive Testing of ethGetBlockByHashProcedure
The tests cover scenarios with and without transaction details and handle requests without an ID. Consider adding tests for invalid hash inputs to ensure error handling is robust.
| it('should handle requests without an id', async () => { | ||
| const request: EthGasPriceJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'eth_gasPrice', | ||
| params: [], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await gasPriceProcedure({ | ||
| getVm: client.getVm, | ||
| forkTransport: client.forkTransport, | ||
| } as any)(request) | ||
|
|
||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('eth_gasPrice') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBe( | ||
| numberToHex( | ||
| await client.getVm().then(async (vm) => (await vm.blockchain.getCanonicalHeadBlock()).header.gasLimit), | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test Case Review: "should handle requests without an id"
This test case effectively checks the procedure's behavior when the 'id' is missing, which is important for robustness. The same type safety concern applies here as in the previous test case.
Consider the same refactor suggestion to avoid using 'any' for better type safety.
| const response = await ethCallProcedure(client)(request) | ||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('eth_call') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| expect(response.result).toMatchSnapshot() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.
While the use of snapshot testing in line 38 is beneficial for capturing output formats, adding assertions that check for specific values within the response.result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the function not only returns a result but also the correct result.
| it('should handle eth_chainId', async () => { | ||
| const res = await handlers.eth_chainId({ | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'eth_chainId', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| }) | ||
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.
While using snapshot testing in line 24 captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
| it('should handle tevm_contract', async () => { | ||
| const res = await handlers.tevm_contract({ | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_contract', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| }) | ||
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.
While using snapshot testing in line 117 captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
| it('should handle tevm_mine', async () => { | ||
| const res = await handlers.tevm_miner({ | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_mine', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: ['0x1', '0x1'], | ||
| }) | ||
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in handler method name for tevm_mine.
The method name tevm_miner on line 102 should be corrected to tevm_mine to match the correct handler name.
- const res = await handlers.tevm_miner({
+ const res = await handlers.tevm_mine({Aside from the typo, this test case effectively checks the behavior of the tevm_mine handler, ensuring the procedure's reliability under typical use cases.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('should handle tevm_mine', async () => { | |
| const res = await handlers.tevm_miner({ | |
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | |
| method: 'tevm_mine', | |
| id: 1, | |
| params: ['0x1', '0x1'], | |
| }) | |
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot() | |
| it('should handle tevm_mine', async () => { | |
| const res = await handlers.tevm_mine({ | |
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | |
| method: 'tevm_mine', | |
| id: 1, | |
| params: ['0x1', '0x1'], | |
| }) | |
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot() |
| it('should return the code of a contract', async () => { | ||
| const request: EthGetCodeJsonRpcRequest = { | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'eth_getCode', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: [contractAddress, 'latest'], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await getCodeProcedure({ | ||
| getVm: client.getVm, | ||
| forkClient: { | ||
| request: async (req) => { | ||
| if (req.method !== 'eth_getCode') { | ||
| throw new Error('Invalid method') | ||
| } | ||
| return SimpleContract.bytecode as any | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| })(request) | ||
|
|
||
| expect(response.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(response.result).toBeDefined() | ||
| expect(response.method).toBe('eth_getCode') | ||
| expect(response.id).toBe(request.id as any) | ||
| expect(response.result).toBe(SimpleContract.bytecode) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.
While the use of snapshot testing in line 56 is beneficial for capturing output formats, adding assertions that check for specific values within the response.result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the function not only returns a result but also the correct result.
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
06-27-_test_tube_test_add_more_procedures_tests
branch
from
2c8b698 to
d99be9a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (11)
packages/procedures/src/__snapshots__/createHandlers.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/dumpstate/__snapshots__/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/setaccount/__snapshots__/setAccountProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (31)
- packages/blockchain/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/call/callProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/dumpstate/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetFilterChangesProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethSignTransactionProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethUninstallFilterProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/gasPriceProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getBalanceProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getCodeProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getStorageAtProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/getaccount/getAccountProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/loadstate/loadStateProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/mine/mineProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/script/scriptProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/setaccount/setAccountProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/blockToJsonRpcBlock.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/generateRandomId.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/parseBlockTag.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/utils/txToJsonRpcTx.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (30)
- packages/blockchain/src/index.ts
- packages/procedures/package.json
- packages/procedures/src/call/callProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/dumpstate/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByHashProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByHashProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByNumberProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetFilterChangesProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethSignTransactionProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethUninstallFilterProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/gasPriceProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getBalanceProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getCodeProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getStorageAtProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/getaccount/getAccountProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/loadstate/loadStateProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/mine/mineProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/script/scriptProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/setaccount/setAccountProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/utils/blockToJsonRpcBlock.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/utils/generateRandomId.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/utils/parseBlockTag.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/utils/txToJsonRpcTx.spec.ts
Additional context used
Biome
packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts
[error] 10-10: This variable implicitly has the any type.
Variable declarations without type annotation and initialization implicitly have the any type. Declare a type or initialize the variable with some value.
(lint/suspicious/noImplicitAnyLet)
Additional comments not posted (8)
packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts (8)
18-24: Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.While using snapshot testing captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
27-43: Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.While using snapshot testing captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
45-54: Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.While using snapshot testing captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
84-99: Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.While using snapshot testing captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
111-117: Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.While using snapshot testing captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
122-129: Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.While using snapshot testing captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
131-138: Consider enhancing test assertions for specific result content.While using snapshot testing captures the output format, adding assertions that check for specific values within the result could provide a more robust test, ensuring that the handler not only returns a result but also the correct result.
101-108: Fix typo in handler method name fortevm_mine.The method name
tevm_mineron line 102 should be corrected totevm_mineto match the correct handler name.- const res = await handlers.tevm_miner({ + const res = await handlers.tevm_mine({Aside from the typo, this test case effectively checks the behavior of the
tevm_minehandler, ensuring the procedure's reliability under typical use cases.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot() | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| // Add more tests for other handlers as needed... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reminder: Add more tests for other handlers.
The placeholder comment indicates that additional tests are needed for comprehensive coverage.
Do you want me to generate the additional test cases or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
| const ERC20_ADDRESS = `0x${'69'.repeat(20)}` as const | ||
|
|
||
| describe('createHandlers', () => { | ||
| let client |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Specify the type for client to enhance type safety.
The variable client is currently implicitly typed as any. Specifying the type explicitly as BaseClient will adhere to TypeScript best practices and improve type safety.
- let client
+ let client: BaseClientCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let client | |
| let client: BaseClient |
Tools
Biome
[error] 10-10: This variable implicitly has the any type.
Variable declarations without type annotation and initialization implicitly have the any type. Declare a type or initialize the variable with some value.
(lint/suspicious/noImplicitAnyLet)
| it('should handle tevm_getAccount', async () => { | ||
| await handlers.tevm_setAccount({ | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_setAccount', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: [ | ||
| { | ||
| address: ERC20_ADDRESS, | ||
| deployedBytecode: ERC20.deployedBytecode, | ||
| balance: numberToHex(420n), | ||
| nonce: numberToHex(69n), | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }) | ||
| const res = await handlers.tevm_getAccount({ | ||
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | ||
| method: 'tevm_getAccount', | ||
| id: 1, | ||
| params: [ | ||
| { | ||
| address: ERC20_ADDRESS, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }) | ||
| expect(res.error).toBeUndefined() | ||
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in snapshot method and validate test for tevm_getAccount.
The method expect(res).toMatchSnapshot on line 81 is missing call parentheses. Correcting this will ensure the snapshot functionality is correctly invoked.
- expect(res).toMatchSnapshot
+ expect(res).toMatchSnapshot()Aside from the typo, this test case effectively checks the integration of setting and getting account details in TEVM, ensuring the procedure's reliability under typical use cases.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('should handle tevm_getAccount', async () => { | |
| await handlers.tevm_setAccount({ | |
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | |
| method: 'tevm_setAccount', | |
| id: 1, | |
| params: [ | |
| { | |
| address: ERC20_ADDRESS, | |
| deployedBytecode: ERC20.deployedBytecode, | |
| balance: numberToHex(420n), | |
| nonce: numberToHex(69n), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| }) | |
| const res = await handlers.tevm_getAccount({ | |
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | |
| method: 'tevm_getAccount', | |
| id: 1, | |
| params: [ | |
| { | |
| address: ERC20_ADDRESS, | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| }) | |
| expect(res.error).toBeUndefined() | |
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot | |
| }) | |
| it('should handle tevm_getAccount', async () => { | |
| await handlers.tevm_setAccount({ | |
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | |
| method: 'tevm_setAccount', | |
| id: 1, | |
| params: [ | |
| { | |
| address: ERC20_ADDRESS, | |
| deployedBytecode: ERC20.deployedBytecode, | |
| balance: numberToHex(420n), | |
| nonce: numberToHex(69n), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| }) | |
| const res = await handlers.tevm_getAccount({ | |
| jsonrpc: '2.0', | |
| method: 'tevm_getAccount', | |
| id: 1, | |
| params: [ | |
| { | |
| address: ERC20_ADDRESS, | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| }) | |
| expect(res.error).toBeUndefined() | |
| expect(res).toMatchSnapshot() | |
| }) |
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
06-27-_test_tube_test_add_more_procedures_tests
branch
from
d99be9a to
35f1c66
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (18)
packages/procedures/src/__snapshots__/createHandlers.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/call/__snapshots__/callProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/dumpstate/__snapshots__/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethGetBlockByHashProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByHashProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/ethGetFilterChangesProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/gasPriceProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/eth/__snapshots__/getBalanceProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/getaccount/__snapshots__/getAccountProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/mine/__snapshots__/mineProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/procedures/src/setaccount/__snapshots__/setAccountProcedure.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
Files selected for processing (24)
- packages/blockchain/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/call/callProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/dumpstate/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByHashProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByNumberProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetFilterChangesProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethUninstallFilterProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/gasPriceProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getBalanceProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getCodeProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getStorageAtProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/getaccount/getAccountProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/loadstate/loadStateProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/procedures/src/mine/mineProcedure.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (24)
- packages/blockchain/src/index.ts
- packages/procedures/package.json
- packages/procedures/src/call/callProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/createHandlers.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/dumpstate/dumpStateProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/blockNumberProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/chainIdProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethBlobBaseFeeProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCallProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethCoinbaseProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethEstimateGasProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByHashProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockByNumberProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByHashProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetBlockTransactionCountByNumberProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethGetFilterChangesProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/ethUninstallFilterProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/gasPriceProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getBalanceProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getCodeProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/eth/getStorageAtProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/getaccount/getAccountProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/loadstate/loadStateProcedure.spec.ts
- packages/procedures/src/mine/mineProcedure.spec.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/blockchain/docs/functions/getBlockFromRpc.md (1 hunks)
- packages/blockchain/docs/globals.md (1 hunks)
- tevm/docs/blockchain/README.md (1 hunks)
- tevm/docs/blockchain/functions/getBlockFromRpc.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tevm/docs/blockchain/README.md
Additional context used
LanguageTool
tevm/docs/blockchain/functions/getBlockFromRpc.md
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...namedParameters,common):Promise\<[Block`](../../block/classes/Block.md)> ## Parame...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/blockchain/docs/globals.md (1)
19-19: Ensure consistent formatting for added function entry.The added function
getBlockFromRpcis correctly included in the functions list. Ensure the link and formatting are consistent with other entries.packages/blockchain/docs/functions/getBlockFromRpc.md (1)
1-29: Ensure clarity and consistency in function documentation.The documentation for
getBlockFromRpcis clear and detailed. Ensure the parameter descriptions are accurate and consistent with the function's implementation.tevm/docs/blockchain/functions/getBlockFromRpc.md (1)
9-9: Add missing punctuation for clarity.A punctuation mark might be missing here. Consider adding a period at the end of the line for better readability.
- > **getBlockFromRpc**(`__namedParameters`, `common`): `Promise`\<[`Block`](../../block/classes/Block.md)\> + > **getBlockFromRpc**(`__namedParameters`, `common`): `Promise`\<[`Block`](../../block/classes/Block.md)\>.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...namedParameters,common):Promise\<[Block`](../../block/classes/Block.md)> ## Parame...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
roninjin10
force-pushed
the
06-27-_test_tube_test_add_more_procedures_tests
branch
from
8b92838 to
b3f581f
Compare
Description
Concise description of proposed changes
Testing
Explain the quality checks that have been done on the code changes
Additional Information
Your ENS/address:
Summary by CodeRabbit
getBlockFromRpcfunction in the blockchain package, enabling retrieval of blocks from an RPC server.getBlockFromRpcfunction.