Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add literals concept #847

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024
Merged

feat: add literals concept #847

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

vaeng
Copy link
Contributor

@vaeng vaeng commented Mar 21, 2024

No description provided.

vaeng
vaeng commented Mar 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vaeng vaeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

about.md will be added when introduction is done.

The plan is to combine the literals and the auto concept to provide a small concept exercise.
The exercise will center around compiler warnings, that can be fixed by adding the correct literals.

@vaeng vaeng added x:action/create Work on something from scratch x:module/concept Work on Concepts x:type/content Work on content (e.g. exercises, concepts) x:size/large Large amount of work labels Mar 21, 2024
@vaeng vaeng merged commit 38eaa89 into main Apr 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@vaeng vaeng deleted the feat--add-literals-concept branch April 9, 2024 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom approved these changes

@siebenschlaefer siebenschlaefer Awaiting requested review from siebenschlaefer

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
x:action/create Work on something from scratch x:module/concept Work on Concepts x:size/large Large amount of work x:type/content Work on content (e.g. exercises, concepts)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@vaeng @ErikSchierboom