-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 547
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Secret Handshake] Fix formatting issue in admonition #2286
Conversation
Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism. We are currently in a phase of our journey where we have paused community contributions to allow us to take a breather and redesign our community model. You can learn more in this blog post. As such, all issues and PRs in this repository are being automatically closed. That doesn't mean we're not interested in your ideas, or that if you're stuck on something we don't want to help. The best place to discuss things is with our community on the Exercism Community Forum. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic there. Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it. |
Thanks @safwansamsudeen. It looks correct to me in the browser on the Ruby track (https://exercism.org/tracks/ruby/exercises/secret-handshake): Which track are you looking at where it is broken? |
Python - is this perhaps track specific? EDIT: perhaps it's because of the instruction append. A second edit: seems not, because even JS formats it like this. |
This was fixed in #2238; the fix just hasn't been pulled yet by some tracks. |
@kytrinyx Upon looking around, it seems both Python and JS lack the blank line between the link text and the link url. You've committed this only on March 27th - perhaps the tracks haven't synced the change yet? Sorry for the confusion - I originally opened this in Python, was redirected here, and then failed to see that there was a blank line difference in this version and Python's. |
@safwansamsudeen this makes sense. The fix would be to run |
@kytrinyx @safwansamsudeen - my apologies. I had forgotten that this was part of exercism/python#3423, which is on hold by Erik, due to concerns that it would re-queue a bunch of Python solutions for retest unnecessarily. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See rejection message below
@SleeplessByte I actually expect this PR to break the rendering in just another way. See this forum thread. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I reviewed the opposite diff which I thought was moving the link inside the admonition.
There is nothing wrong with this markdown and this PR should remain closed.
If tracks have broken admonitions, they should sync with the problem specs. I think the JavaScript track is one of them like mentioned.
configlet
can help here.
Thank you for that. I just rejected this. I've ran it myself and the old (current) markdown is correct. This PR is invalid. The problem here was that the GitHub app did NOT show me the closed PR or other messages until after i read your message (via notification). |
Nice to see this issue understood, thanks to everybody! |
There's a note which is looks incorrect in the UI. I think this change will solve it.
This is a basic PR, so I have not discussed it in the forum beforehand.