leap: Remove recommendation to DIY in description #778
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Leap-year functions don't generally occur in standard libraries. Is there a single example of a language we have that does this? If there is one, then that would be the right way to solve this exercise in that language. Presumably this exercise is primarily placed at the top of core tracks. We should not encourage to re-implement standard library functions at that point. But this is a hypothetical argument. exercism/problem-specifications#1418
petertseng
added
the
sync/readme
|
By the way, since all other otherwise-active maintainers declared themselves unavailable, I'm merging this without review. Post-merge review is encouraged when maintainers become available again. |
|
and because this blocks other PRs that are to be merged. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Leap-year functions don't generally occur in standard libraries.
Is there a single example of a language we have that does this?
If there is one, then that would be the right way to solve this exercise
in that language. Presumably this exercise is primarily placed at the
top of core tracks. We should not encourage to re-implement standard
library functions at that point. But this is a hypothetical argument.
exercism/problem-specifications#1418