You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although 0 is a valid hostname, its not very likely that this name is used (some implementations have issues handling numeric-only hostnames). Imho this is an edge-case we can omit.
8bf3b4c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks better but what if server name is
'0'
? It should be possible according to and Section 2.1 of [RFC1123].8bf3b4c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although
0
is a valid hostname, its not very likely that this name is used (some implementations have issues handling numeric-only hostnames).Imho this is an edge-case we can omit.
8bf3b4c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't know it was a valid hostname!
As @KOTRET stated, I doubt this case will happen but anyway, it's fixed in 5f63fca