Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation about empty functional components #6419

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 7, 2016
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions docs/docs/05-reusable-components.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -299,4 +299,8 @@ However, you may still specify `.propTypes` and `.defaultProps` by setting them
>
> Because stateless functions don't have a backing instance, you can't attach a ref to a stateless function component. Normally this isn't an issue, since stateless functions do not provide an imperative API. Without an imperative API, there isn't much you could do with an instance anyway. However, if a user wants to find the DOM node of a stateless function component, they must wrap the component in a stateful component (eg. ES6 class component) and attach the ref to the stateful wrapper component.

> NOTE:
>
> In React v0.14, stateless functional components were not permitted to return `null` or `false` (a workaround is to return a `<noscript />` instead). This was fixed in React v15, and stateless functional components are now permitted to return `null`.

In an ideal world, most of your components would be stateless functions because in the future we’ll also be able to make performance optimizations specific to these components by avoiding unnecessary checks and memory allocations. This is the recommended pattern, when possible.